Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coordinate cones and the separate stationary generator

Statement

For an end satisfying the exact asymptotically stationary end contract, the coordinate vector ∂t is uniformly timelike on O1, and every nonzero vector tangent to a coordinate level set of t in O1 is spacelike. The separate hypothesis g(T,T)<−C−1 on Σ1 concerns the complete stationary generator T, not merely ∂t. If a second Killing field K and a Killing horizon H for K are supplied, meaning that H is a smooth embedded null hypersurface and K is tangent and normal on its nonempty dense nonzero part, the end conditions do not imply that K is timelike on Σ1 or O1. This non-implication holds even if K is complete.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The end contract supplies g00<−C−1, gijZiZj≥C−1∣Z∣2 and the separate uniform timelikeness condition for T on Σ1. It also supplies the smooth time-oriented Lorentzian and causal conventions, the acausal hypersurface and its smooth end/remainder realization, the remaining coordinate estimates on O1, and the completeness and asymptotics of T. Exact asymptotically stationary end contract

[F2]

A Killing horizon for a specified Killing field K is a smooth embedded null hypersurface on whose nonempty dense nonzero-generator part K is tangent and normal. The null normal line is the radical of the induced metric. This definition asserts no relation between K and the stationary field T, and imposes no field equation. Bifurcate Killing horizons, rotation and normalization

Proof

Given: An end and coordinates satisfying [F1]; any additional horizon and field use [F2].

Goal: Prove the coordinate-cone conclusions and exhibit an end with a complete horizon-normal field that is not timelike on that end.

1.1F1

Since g(∂t,∂t)=g00<−C−1 on O1, the coordinate time vector is uniformly timelike there.

1.2F1

A nonzero tangent vector to t=constant has the form v=∑iZi∂xi with Z≠0, so g(v,v)=gijZiZj≥C−1∣Z∣2>0. The bound on g(T,T) is separately imposed in end clause (3), on Σ1.

1.3F1construct

For the countermodel take M=R4 with its standard smooth structure and orientation, g=−dt2+(dx1)2+(dx2)2+(dx3)2, time orientation N=∂t, and T=∂t. Set Σ={t=0}, Σ1={t=0, ∣x∣>1}, Σ′={t=0, ∣x∣≤1} and O1={(t,x):∣x∣>1}. These are the standard embedded hyperplane, open exterior and closed ball, with their usual smooth structures. For a future causal vector (a,b), the metric and orientation give a≥∣b∣ and a>0. Thus along every nonconstant future causal curve the locally absolutely continuous coordinate t is strictly increasing, by integrating its positive almost-everywhere derivative on any compact parameter subinterval. Consequently Σ is acausal.

2.1F1step 1.3construct

Take R1=1, E={z:∣z∣>1}, E‾={z:∣z∣≥1}, e(z)=(0,z), j(z)=(0,z) and h=j∣∂E‾. The sphere S=∂Σ′={t=0,∣x∣=1} is connected; h is a diffeomorphism onto S, j(E‾)∩Σ′=S and j(E‾)∪Σ′=Σ. With C=2, k=2, α=λ=1, all metric differences, positive-order derivatives and Hölder differences in end clause (1) vanish. Its remaining bounds are −1<−1/2 and ∣Z∣2≥∣Z∣2/2, and r>1 throughout O1. The complete flow ϕu(t,x)=(t+u,x) preserves g, so T is Killing, g(T,T)=−1<−1/2, and the asymptotics hold with A=1 and zero error. This verifies all three end clauses.

3.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1∎

Define K=∂t+∂x1 and H={t=x1}. Its flow ψu(t,x1,x2,x3)=(t+u,x1+u,x2,x3) is defined for all real u and preserves the constant metric, so K is a complete Killing field distinct from T. The map (s,y,z)↦(s,s,y,z) smoothly embeds R3 onto H; the induced form is dy2+dz2, with radical spanned by the everywhere nonzero tangent vector K. Equivalently, g(K,⋅)=−dt+dx1 annihilates TH. Thus H is a Killing horizon for K under [F2]. But g(K,K)=−1+1=0 everywhere, including on Σ1 and O1. The fully verified end therefore does not force even pointwise timelikeness of a separate complete horizon-normal field, while retaining all coordinate and stationary bounds.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.