Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A common positive Harrison domain across the compact sphere

Statement

Let S be a compact embedded smooth two-dimensional submanifold of stationary Lorentzian data, with positive-definite induced metric, with T tangent to S, and with a supplied zero p∈S of T. On an open neighborhood U of S, suppose σ=f+iψ with ψ:U→R, and suppose a smooth stationary one-form W0 is given (stationary means LTW0=0), with f=−g(T,T), F=12dT♭, dW0=4((f−1)F+ψ⋆gF) and W0(T)=D0(p)−D0, where D0=∣1−σ∣2. Set Dq=∣1+q−(1−q)σ∣2 and Wq=(1−q)2W0−4q(1−q)T♭. There is a common open neighborhood O⊆U of S with Dq>0 and Dq+Wq(T)=dq>0 for every q∈[0,1], where dq=Dq(p). On O, the polynomial curl and contraction identities are dWq=4(1−q)(((1−q)f−(1+q))F+(1−q)ψ⋆gF) and Wq(T)=dq−Dq.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The metric, forms and ZFC convention are Stationary Lorentzian data and tensor conventions, Complex self-dual forms and metric-dependent contraction and The Axiom of Choice. Stationarity of the one-form W0 means LTW0=0, with the Lie derivative of a differential form defined in The Lie derivative of a differential form.

[F2]

The denominator calculation is recorded in Positive Harrison denominator and its parameter identity. Its needed algebra and neighborhood construction are repeated below; the supplier's additional smoothness and stationarity assumptions on σ are not assumed here or used to invoke its full statement.

[F3]

The polynomial one-form calculation is recorded in Lifting a normalized stationary primitive to the Harrison parameter. Its contraction and curl calculations are repeated below directly from the assumed identities for W0, without differentiating ψ or invoking the supplier under unverified scalar hypotheses.

[F4]

The surface is an embedded two-dimensional smooth submanifold with its inherited topology, as in Embedded submanifolds and slice charts. Positive-definiteness of its induced metric is the explicit spacelike assumption in the Statement.

[F5]

For real a,b, ∣a+ib∣2=a2+b2, with the real and imaginary coordinates and modulus of Real and imaginary parts, complex conjugation, and modulus.

[F6]

Smooth scalar maps include continuity in Cʳ and smooth maps between smooth manifolds. The open-neighborhood criterion for continuity is Continuity of a map of topological spaces at a point and globally.

[F7]

The exterior derivative is defined by The exterior derivative by the invariant vector-field formula. Its defining sums are linear in the form, so d(aα+bβ)=a dα+b dβ for spacetime-constant real a,b and smooth forms α,β.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement and the mathematical conventions in [F1]–[F7].

Goal: Prove the common positivity and the polynomial identities without additional hypotheses on the scalar ψ.

1.1givenF1F2F4F6

By the induced-metric hypothesis and tangency, g(T,T)≥0 on S, so f≤0 there. In coordinates f=−gabTaTb is a finite sum of products of smooth functions, hence is smooth and continuous. Define O={x∈U:f(x)<12}. The open-neighborhood criterion in [F6], applied to (−∞,12), makes O open in U and hence in the ambient manifold. It contains S and is independent of q. This gives the neighborhood construction in [F2] using only the regularity of f.

2.1givenF1F2F5algebrastep 1.1

For x∈O and q∈[0,1], put aq=1+q−(1−q)f=2q+(1−q)(1−f). Since 1−f>12, aq≥12 (also at q=1). By [F5], Dq=aq2+(1−q)2ψ2≥14>0. At p, T(p)=0 gives f(p)=0, so dq=(1+q)2+(1−q)2ψ(p)2≥1. Neither estimate requires continuity or stationarity of ψ.

3.1givenF1F2F3F5algebrastep 2.1

Repeating the pointwise calculation of [F2], subtract (1−q)2D0 from Dq using [F5]. The ψ2 terms cancel, leaving (1+q−(1−q)f)2−(1−q)2(1−f)2=4q(1−(1−q)f). Thus Dq=(1−q)2D0+4q(1−(1−q)f), and dq=(1−q)2D0(p)+4q. For the contraction calculation of [F3], T♭(T)=−f gives Wq(T)=(1−q)2(D0(p)−D0)+4q(1−q)f=dq−Dq. Consequently Dq+Wq(T)=dq≥1 on the same O. These are pointwise algebraic identities with no scalar regularity premise.

4.1givenF1F3F7algebrastep 3.1∎

For the curl calculation of [F3], hold q fixed and use [F7] and dT♭=2F to obtain dWq=4(1−q)2((f−1)F+ψ⋆gF)−8q(1−q)F=4(1−q)(((1−q)f−(1+q))F+(1−q)ψ⋆gF). No derivative of ψ is taken. The defining expression for Wq is polynomial in q with smooth spacetime coefficients. Also D0=D0(p)−W0(T) is smooth by the assumed contraction identity, and the formula in step 3.1 makes Dq smooth jointly in spacetime and q. The curl's displayed right-hand side equals the smooth form dWq by the assumed curl identity and the calculation just given. Hence these are smooth local identities on all of O, including either side of any horizon lying in O; no restriction to an exterior is used.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.