How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Gradient Hölder control by differentiated flux and one-dimensional lifting
Statement
Let be a smooth flux on a coordinate ball times ; assume symmetric with and . Let be a smooth scalar solution of with . On each strictly smaller ball there exist and , depending only on dimension, ellipticity, and the interior separation, such that . No uniform second-derivative bound is assumed.
Facts & Assumptions
Hölder norms and classical derivatives are as in the Euclidean interface. Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains
On an open Euclidean set, consists of almost-everywhere classes of square-integrable functions with square-integrable first weak derivatives; use the real scalar case here. The notation Hᵏ and the reserved zero-boundary symbol
For a bounded measurable uniformly elliptic real matrix on an open set , the homogeneous local weak equation means and for every ; this is the supplier convention with operator , zero lower-order coefficients and zero datum, without a boundary condition. Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator
Work in ZFC, including choice for the imported analytic input and the Countable Choice assumptions of the Sobolev and weak-solution interfaces. The Axiom of Choice
Use the scalar homogeneous divergence-form De Giorgi–Nash estimate from Theorem 3.17 as recorded in External input, in one additional Euclidean dimension.
Proof
Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.
Goal: Establish the asserted estimate with the stated uniform dependence.
For each , put , and , with the partial derivative at fixed . Differentiating the flux equation gives . The matrix is measurable, symmetric and uniformly elliptic, and . Smoothness justifies the differentiation without any uniform Hessian estimate.
Write for the coordinate dimension. Here is a local reduction of this inhomogeneous equation to the exact homogeneous source statement. If is zero there is nothing to prove. Otherwise put and . On a cylinder strictly inside the coordinate ball times use the symmetric matrix , where . Its quadratic form is at least , since and . It has a uniform upper bound too. Direct distributional differentiation, using independence of , gives .
Let be any -dimensional ball with closure in this cylinder. The smooth function and all its first classical derivatives are bounded on , so they are square-integrable on ; integration by parts against compactly supported tests identifies these classical derivatives as its weak derivatives. Thus , without requiring a uniform bound on its norm. For each , integration by parts in the divergence identity of step 2.1 gives . Hence is a scalar homogeneous weak solution with exactly the convention and coefficient hypotheses needed in F20.
Apply the imported homogeneous theorem in dimension on the balls of step 3.1, after translation and dilation to the unit ball. Since has a universal bound on the fixed cylinder, its norm is uniformly bounded on each such ball. Restrict the resulting Hölder estimate to and multiply by . A finite cover of every smaller coordinate ball yields . Doing this for the finitely many proves the assertion. The exponent may be decreased below one; no value of the prescribed later Schauder exponent is assumed here.
External input
[F20] Imported established input: For a weak solution of , with measurable symmetric matrix , there are and depending only on dimension and ellipticity such that . Scalar real-valued weak solution on a Euclidean ball; bounded measurable uniformly elliptic coefficients; the symmetric case suffices here. Used in dimension for an -dimensional coordinate ball after a local lifting, not directly on the nonlinear graph equation. Reading limits: Checked the extracted statement, hypotheses and immediate proof note of Theorem 3.17 on printed p. 93 (PDF p. 99) in the author-hosted PDF. The underlying De Giorgi–Nash argument was not read or reconstructed. The local lifting, weak-solution verification and graph application are authored here.
Depends on
- Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains
- The Axiom of Choice
- The notation Hᵏ and the reserved zero-boundary symbol
- Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator
- Xavier Fernández-Real and Xavier Ros-Oton, Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE · Theorem 3.17, printed p. 93, PDF p. 99
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For a weak solution $z\in H^1(B_1)$ of $\operatorname{div}(A Dz)=0$, with measurable symmetric matrix $\lambda I\le A\le\Lambda I$, there are $\beta>0$ and $C$ depending only on dimension and ellipticity such that $\|z\|_{C^{0,\beta}(B_{1/2})}\le C\|z\|_{L^2(B_1)}$.
Hypotheses: Scalar real-valued weak solution on a Euclidean ball; bounded measurable uniformly elliptic coefficients; the symmetric case suffices here. Used in dimension $n+1$ for an $n$-dimensional coordinate ball after a local lifting, not directly on the nonlinear graph equation.
Reading limits: Checked the extracted statement, hypotheses and immediate proof note of Theorem 3.17 on printed p. 93 (PDF p. 99) in the author-hosted PDF. The underlying De Giorgi–Nash argument was not read or reconstructed. The local lifting, weak-solution verification and graph application are authored here.
Sources
- Xavier Fernández-Real and Xavier Ros-Oton, Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE · Theorem 3.17, printed p. 93, PDF p. 99