Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gradient Hölder control by differentiated flux and one-dimensional lifting

Statement

Let P(y,p) be a smooth flux on a coordinate ball times ∣p∣≤p0; assume Pp symmetric with λI≤Pp≤ΛI and ∣Py∣≤K. Let w be a smooth scalar solution of div⁡P(y,Dw)=0 with ∣Dw∣≤p0. On each strictly smaller ball there exist 0<β<1 and C, depending only on dimension, ellipticity, K,p0 and the interior separation, such that ∥Dw∥C0,β≤C. No uniform second-derivative bound is assumed.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Hölder norms and classical derivatives are as in the Euclidean interface. Hölder spaces C^k,α, closure and interior scaled norms, and C^k,α domains

[F2]

On an open Euclidean set, H1=W1,2 consists of almost-everywhere classes of square-integrable functions with square-integrable first weak derivatives; use the real scalar case here. The notation Hᵏ and the reserved zero-boundary symbol

[F3]

For a bounded measurable uniformly elliptic real matrix B on an open set U, the homogeneous local weak equation div⁡(BDu)=0 means u∈H1(U) and ∫U(BDu)⋅Dφ=0 for every φ∈Cc∞(U); this is the supplier convention with operator −div⁡(BD), zero lower-order coefficients and zero datum, without a boundary condition. Local weak solutions of a divergence-form operator

[A1]

Work in ZFC, including choice for the imported analytic input and the Countable Choice assumptions of the Sobolev and weak-solution interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

[F20]

Use the scalar homogeneous divergence-form De Giorgi–Nash estimate from Theorem 3.17 as recorded in External input, in one additional Euclidean dimension.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses in the Statement.

Goal: Establish the asserted estimate with the stated uniform dependence.

1.1givenF1algebra

For each k, put z=Dkw, a(y)=Pp(y,Dw(y)) and F(y)=−Pyk(y,Dw(y)), with Pyk the partial derivative at fixed p. Differentiating the flux equation gives div⁡(aDz)=div⁡F. The matrix a is measurable, symmetric and uniformly elliptic, ∣z∣≤p0 and ∣F∣≤K. Smoothness justifies the differentiation without any uniform Hessian estimate.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

Write n for the coordinate dimension. Here is a local reduction of this inhomogeneous equation to the exact homogeneous source statement. If M=∥z∥∞+∥F∥∞ is zero there is nothing to prove. Otherwise put Z(y,t)=z(y)/M+t and H=F/M. On a cylinder strictly inside the coordinate ball times (−1,1) use the symmetric matrix B=(a−H−HTL), where L=1+2/λ. Its quadratic form is at least (λ/2)∣ξ∣2+∣τ∣2, since ∣H∣≤1 and 2∣τH⋅ξ∣≤(λ/2)∣ξ∣2+(2/λ)τ2. It has a uniform upper bound too. Direct distributional differentiation, using independence of t, gives div⁡y,t(BDZ)=div⁡y(aDz/M−H)=0.

3.1step 2.1F2F3F20A1algebra

Let U be any (n+1)-dimensional ball with closure in this cylinder. The smooth function Z and all its first classical derivatives are bounded on U‾, so they are square-integrable on U; integration by parts against compactly supported tests identifies these classical derivatives as its weak derivatives. Thus Z∈H1(U), without requiring a uniform bound on its H1 norm. For each φ∈Cc∞(U), integration by parts in the divergence identity of step 2.1 gives ∫U(BDZ)⋅Dφ=0. Hence Z is a scalar homogeneous weak solution with exactly the convention and coefficient hypotheses needed in F20.

4.1F20A1step 3.1F1∎

Apply the imported homogeneous theorem in dimension n+1 on the balls of step 3.1, after translation and dilation to the unit ball. Since ∣Z∣ has a universal bound on the fixed cylinder, its L2 norm is uniformly bounded on each such ball. Restrict the resulting Hölder estimate to t=0 and multiply by M. A finite cover of every smaller coordinate ball yields ∥z∥C0,β≤C(∥z∥∞+∥F∥∞). Doing this for the finitely many k proves the assertion. The exponent may be decreased below one; no value of the prescribed later Schauder exponent is assumed here.

External input

[F20] Imported established input: For a weak solution z∈H1(B1) of div⁡(ADz)=0, with measurable symmetric matrix λI≤A≤ΛI, there are β>0 and C depending only on dimension and ellipticity such that ∥z∥C0,β(B1/2)≤C∥z∥L2(B1). Scalar real-valued weak solution on a Euclidean ball; bounded measurable uniformly elliptic coefficients; the symmetric case suffices here. Used in dimension n+1 for an n-dimensional coordinate ball after a local lifting, not directly on the nonlinear graph equation. Reading limits: Checked the extracted statement, hypotheses and immediate proof note of Theorem 3.17 on printed p. 93 (PDF p. 99) in the author-hosted PDF. The underlying De Giorgi–Nash argument was not read or reconstructed. The local lifting, weak-solution verification and graph application are authored here.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Xavier Fernández-Real and Xavier Ros-Oton, Regularity Theory for Elliptic PDE · Theorem 3.17, printed p. 93, PDF p. 99

For a weak solution $z\in H^1(B_1)$ of $\operatorname{div}(A Dz)=0$, with measurable symmetric matrix $\lambda I\le A\le\Lambda I$, there are $\beta>0$ and $C$ depending only on dimension and ellipticity such that $\|z\|_{C^{0,\beta}(B_{1/2})}\le C\|z\|_{L^2(B_1)}$.

Hypotheses: Scalar real-valued weak solution on a Euclidean ball; bounded measurable uniformly elliptic coefficients; the symmetric case suffices here. Used in dimension $n+1$ for an $n$-dimensional coordinate ball after a local lifting, not directly on the nonlinear graph equation.

Reading limits: Checked the extracted statement, hypotheses and immediate proof note of Theorem 3.17 on printed p. 93 (PDF p. 99) in the author-hosted PDF. The underlying De Giorgi–Nash argument was not read or reconstructed. The local lifting, weak-solution verification and graph application are authored here.

Sources