How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Uniform coordinate-sphere area and null expansion
PDF p. 21: Proof of Proposition 4.1; PDF p. 22: Proof of Proposition 4.1; (4.2)
Statement
Work in the inherited ZFC convention. Adopt the mass-one stationary vacuum end, pole, normalized Ernst potential and specified Harrison family of the component-asymptotics supplier, including its hypotheses. Write , , , and as in the Harrison normalization. For sufficiently large , let be the coordinate sphere and its induced metric. Let be the unit round metric. Fix finitely many smooth angular charts with compact subsets whose relative interiors cover , as in the null-normal supplier. Uniformly in and angle, The unsigned area and the expansion of the future outward null normal normalized by therefore satisfy One radius works for all : beyond it, each slice is spacelike, is timelike, and the stationary translates of each coordinate sphere form a timelike cylinder. Here means a bound with a constant independent of , radius and angle; the angular component estimates are understood on those compact chart subsets, with one constant for the finite collection.
Statement references
Uniform transformed component estimates
Uniform denominator and one-form estimates
Invertibility, Lorentz signature and stationary norm
Normalized outward null normal at large coordinate spheres
Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density
Facts & Assumptions
On the specified end, with constants and spatial derivatives uniform in , and ; the time-time component is . The definition of differentiated bounds controls derivatives in Cartesian coordinates. Uniform transformed component estimates Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
The pole factor is bounded above and away from zero uniformly on . Uniform denominator and one-form estimates Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
The transformed metric is Lorentzian and stationary. The normalized future outward null normal has , , and ; its expansion is . Invertibility, Lorentz signature and stationary norm Normalized outward null normal at large coordinate spheres Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
The inherited ZFC convention includes the axiom of choice. In particular it supplies countable choice: applying a choice function to the family of values of a sequence of nonempty sets gives a choice in each term. This meets the round-sphere and density-integration suppliers' choice hypotheses; the null-screen interface already assumes this convention. The Axiom of Choice Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
The unit round sphere is with the Euclidean induced metric; it is a compact smooth boundaryless Riemannian surface, and . The round-sphere model supplier applies with and radius , under [A1]. Round sphere model geometry
On a smooth Riemannian two-surface the unsigned area density in local coordinates is . Under [A1] this defines a Borel measure finite on compact sets, whose integral agrees with smooth density integration. Thus for a compact surface; no orientation is required. Riemannian volume density Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density
For an invertible real square matrix and a matrix direction , . In particular, along a differentiable positive-definite matrix family, the ordinary chain rule gives . The determinant differential is D det(A)[H]=tr(adj(A)H) at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus
Proof
Given: The inherited ZFC convention, the end and family in the Statement, with and sufficiently large .
Goal: Prove the uniform metric, area, expansion and causal estimates.
In angular coordinates , the Euclidean identities and (the second obtained by differentiating ) turn [F1] into , where and its first angular derivatives are and . These bounds follow by the chain rule from the differentiated Cartesian estimates. Since , this gives the first display. The inverse of the parenthesized matrix is uniformly bounded relative to the round metric for large .
The spatial block in [F1] is positive definite for large , so the coordinate slices are spacelike. After scaling the time basis vector by and spatial basis vectors by , the metric matrix is the Minkowski diagonal matrix plus ; the mixed terms have this order because . Its inverse consequently has negative time-time entry for one common large radius, so is timelike. The displayed time-time estimate makes timelike there. Since is tangent to the stationary cylinder and the sphere directions form a positive two-plane orthogonal to a suitable timelike combination within its tangent space, the induced cylinder metric is Lorentzian.
Compute the round area in these conventions. Away from one meridian and the poles, write for and . Taking Euclidean inner products of its two derivatives gives the induced matrix , so [F5] gives density . The omitted meridian and poles have zero area: in finitely many regular charts covering them the smooth density is bounded, each compact smooth arc has bounded coordinate derivative and can be covered by squares of side with total area , and each point has arbitrarily small square covers. Hence .
The determinant identity in [F6], applied to the positive matrix of step 1.1, gives . As , the error is . Likewise uniformly. Using [F5] and step 1.3, integrate this density over the compact unit sphere. After factoring out , the density error is bounded in absolute value by times the round density, uniformly in and angle, so the integral is . At this is the stated area estimate.
The differentiated component estimates and the explicit quadratic-root construction of the normal in Normalized outward null normal at large coordinate spheres also give, on the fixed compact chart subsets, , , and . Indeed angular differentiation is ; differentiating the scaled inverse matrix and the positive square root preserves the uniform estimates because their denominators are bounded away from zero by [F2] and the scaled metric is uniformly close to Minkowski space.
Stationarity eliminates the term in the coordinate formula for the Lie derivative. The bounds from steps 1.1 and 2.2, together with , and on the fixed compact chart subsets, show that all terms other than contribute to the trace. In particular, controls the mixed time term uniformly at . Thus . Since , replacing by changes this by . Step 2.1 gives the asserted expansion.
Depends on
- Uniform transformed component estimates
- Uniform denominator and one-form estimates
- Invertibility, Lorentz signature and stationary norm
- Normalized outward null normal at large coordinate spheres
- Null expansions, screen quotients and focal data
- Differentiated asymptotic bounds and parameter uniformity
- Mass-one convention and Harrison denominator
- Round sphere model geometry
- Riemannian volume density
- Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density
- The determinant differential is D det(A)[H]=tr(adj(A)H) at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus
- The Axiom of Choice
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- The uniqueness of smooth stationary black holes · PDF pp. 21–22, proof of Proposition 4.1 and equation (4.2)