Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Euler class group presentation

PDF p. 3: Expected Euler class comparison

Definition

Let k be an algebraically closed field and let A be a reduced, finitely generated commutative k-algebra of Krull dimension d≥2. The height of an ideal is the least height of a prime containing it; the height of a prime is the supremum of the lengths of chains of primes ending there. An ideal J is m-primary if J=m and ab∈J, a∉J imply b∈m.

Let F(A) be the free abelian group on the set of pairs (J,ωJ) in which J is an m-primary ideal of height d for a maximal ideal m, and ωJ:(A/J)d↠J/J2 is an A/J-linear surjection. The map is called an orientation here; distinct surjections are distinct generators.

For an ideal I of height d and an orientation ωI:(A/I)d↠I/I2, write its unique irredundant primary decomposition as I=⋂iJi, where Ji is mi-primary for distinct maximal ideals. The Chinese remainder identifications induce orientations ωJi:(A/Ji)d↠Ji/Ji2. Put [(I,ωI)]=∑i[(Ji,ωJi)]∈F(A). An orientation is globally lifted if there is an A-linear surjection ω~:Ad↠I whose induced map modulo I is ωI. Let K(A) be the subgroup generated by all [(I,ωI)] with globally lifted orientation. The Euler class group in this presentation is the quotient E(A)=F(A)/K(A). This definition asserts no comparison with a motivic group.

Justification

Given: A, d, I, and ωI as above.

Goal: Show that the component sum and quotient are well defined.

1.1 The ring A is Noetherian because it is a finitely generated algebra over a field. Every prime containing I has height at least d and at most dim⁡A=d, so it is maximal. Thus B=A/I is a Noetherian ring of dimension zero. [assume-hyp]

1.2 The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space: ascending chains of ideals stabilize. Such a space is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets; otherwise a maximal closed counterexample could be split into two smaller closed subsets. Every nonempty irreducible closed subset of Spec⁡B has a generic prime, and that prime is maximal. Hence B has finitely many maximal ideals n1,…,nr. The empty-spectrum case gives the zero ring and the empty sum. [step 1.1]

1.3 The nilradical N of B is the intersection of these maximal ideals. It is finitely generated, and each of its generators is nilpotent, so Ns=0 for some s. Distinct maximal ideals are comaximal, so their powers nis are pairwise comaximal and their product is Ns=0. The Chinese remainder map therefore gives B≅∏iB/nis. Each factor is local with nilpotent maximal ideal, hence its zero ideal is primary: an element outside the maximal ideal is a unit. Pulling the kernels of the factor projections back to A gives an irredundant decomposition I=⋂iJi with Ji primary and radical the inverse image mi of ni. [step 1.2, construct]

1.4 This decomposition is unique. Indeed, in any irredundant primary decomposition of I, the radicals are precisely the maximal ideals containing I: their intersection is I, and primality and maximality force the two finite sets of radicals to coincide. Localizing at mi makes every other component the unit ideal. An mi-primary ideal is the contraction of its localization at mi, since multiplication by an element outside mi cannot carry an element outside the ideal into it. Thus its component is necessarily IAmi∩A. [step 1.3]

1.5 Write Li=⋂j≠iJj. The ideals Ji and Li are comaximal, so I=JiLi, I+Ji2=Ji, and I∩Ji2=IJi. Consequently inclusion induces an isomorphism (I/I2)⊗A/IA/Ji  ≅  I/IJi  ≅  Ji/Ji2. Tensoring ωI with A/Ji and using this isomorphism yields the stated surjection ωJi. By step 1.4, neither the component ideals nor their induced maps depend on a decomposition choice. [step 1.4, construct]

1.6 The indicated pairs form a set, so the free abelian group exists. The globally lifted component sums form a subset of it; their integer span is a subgroup, and its cosets form an abelian quotient. Steps 1.4–1.5 establish that each relation is unambiguous. [step 1.4, step 1.5, construct] ∎

Used by · 1

Sources