How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Euler class group presentation
PDF p. 3: Expected Euler class comparison
Definition
Let be an algebraically closed field and let be a reduced, finitely generated commutative -algebra of Krull dimension . The height of an ideal is the least height of a prime containing it; the height of a prime is the supremum of the lengths of chains of primes ending there. An ideal is -primary if and , imply .
Let be the free abelian group on the set of pairs in which is an -primary ideal of height for a maximal ideal , and is an -linear surjection. The map is called an orientation here; distinct surjections are distinct generators.
For an ideal of height and an orientation , write its unique irredundant primary decomposition as , where is -primary for distinct maximal ideals. The Chinese remainder identifications induce orientations . Put An orientation is globally lifted if there is an -linear surjection whose induced map modulo is . Let be the subgroup generated by all with globally lifted orientation. The Euler class group in this presentation is the quotient . This definition asserts no comparison with a motivic group.
Justification
Given: , , , and as above.
Goal: Show that the component sum and quotient are well defined.
1.1 The ring is Noetherian because it is a finitely generated algebra over a field. Every prime containing has height at least and at most , so it is maximal. Thus is a Noetherian ring of dimension zero. [assume-hyp]
1.2 The spectrum of a Noetherian ring is a Noetherian topological space: ascending chains of ideals stabilize. Such a space is a finite union of irreducible closed subsets; otherwise a maximal closed counterexample could be split into two smaller closed subsets. Every nonempty irreducible closed subset of has a generic prime, and that prime is maximal. Hence has finitely many maximal ideals . The empty-spectrum case gives the zero ring and the empty sum. [step 1.1]
1.3 The nilradical of is the intersection of these maximal ideals. It is finitely generated, and each of its generators is nilpotent, so for some . Distinct maximal ideals are comaximal, so their powers are pairwise comaximal and their product is . The Chinese remainder map therefore gives . Each factor is local with nilpotent maximal ideal, hence its zero ideal is primary: an element outside the maximal ideal is a unit. Pulling the kernels of the factor projections back to gives an irredundant decomposition with primary and radical the inverse image of . [step 1.2, construct]
1.4 This decomposition is unique. Indeed, in any irredundant primary decomposition of , the radicals are precisely the maximal ideals containing : their intersection is , and primality and maximality force the two finite sets of radicals to coincide. Localizing at makes every other component the unit ideal. An -primary ideal is the contraction of its localization at , since multiplication by an element outside cannot carry an element outside the ideal into it. Thus its component is necessarily . [step 1.3]
1.5 Write . The ideals and are comaximal, so , , and . Consequently inclusion induces an isomorphism Tensoring with and using this isomorphism yields the stated surjection . By step 1.4, neither the component ideals nor their induced maps depend on a decomposition choice. [step 1.4, construct]
1.6 The indicated pairs form a set, so the free abelian group exists. The globally lifted component sums form a subset of it; their integer span is a subgroup, and its cosets form an abelian quotient. Steps 1.4–1.5 establish that each relation is unambiguous. [step 1.4, step 1.5, construct] ∎
Sources
- Murthy’s conjecture on 0-cycles · Section 7.1, Definition 7.1