Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Valuative dimension and degreewise bounded towers

PDF p. 4: Finite valuative dimension; PDF p. 9: Boundedness input

Definition

All rings are commutative with identity. The Krull dimension of a nonzero ring is the supremum, in the nonnegative integers together with infinity, of the lengths n of strict chains of prime ideals p0⊊⋯⊊pn. The zero ring has dimension −1. A domain is a nonzero ring without zero divisors. Its fraction field is denoted Frac⁡(D). A valuation overring of a domain D is a subring V of Frac⁡(D) containing D such that, for every nonzero element x of that field, at least one of x and x−1 lies in V.

The valuative dimension dim⁡vD of a domain D is the supremum of the Krull dimensions of its valuation overrings. For a ring A, put dim⁡vA=sup⁡p∈Spec⁡Adim⁡v(A/p), with the supremum of the empty set equal to −1. For a scheme X, put dim⁡vX=sup⁡Spec⁡A⊆Xdim⁡vA, over all affine open subschemes, again taking the empty supremum to be −1. The scheme has finite valuative dimension if this value is finite.

Let FjE be a decreasing filtration of a spectrum E, and let S be a specified set of integers. It is degreewise bounded above in filtration on S if, for every i∈S, there is an integer N(i) such that πiFjE=0 for all j≥N(i). If S=Z, it is simply degreewise bounded above in filtration. The bound may depend on i. This is a condition on the homotopy groups of the stages; completeness is the separately defined condition that the inverse limit of the tower is the zero spectrum.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A scheme X, or a decreasing filtration F∙E and a set S⊆Z.

Goal: Justify the quantities and conditions in the definition.

[F1]

A scheme has a set of affine open subschemes and their coordinate rings; a decreasing filtration has stages FjE, transition maps and functorial homotopy groups. The tower-vanishing definition of completeness is the one stated above. Schemes and morphisms over a base Decreasing spectral filtrations and associated graded

Justification

1.1 The fraction field of a domain is itself a valuation overring, so the supremum defining dim⁡vD is taken over a nonempty set. Prime quotients are domains. Prime ideals, subrings of a fixed field, affine opens and finite chains of ideals form sets; their suprema exist in {−1,0,1,…,∞} with the stated empty convention. Isomorphisms of rings preserve prime chains, fraction fields and valuation overrings, so the scheme expression does not depend on the chosen presentation of any particular affine open. [F1, given, construct]

2.1 Each πiFjE is a well-defined group, and the displayed quantifiers give a definite property of the tower and the specified set of degrees. The bound is chosen separately for each degree. Completeness is a condition on the inverse limit, so the two formulations are recorded separately; no uniform bound or injectivity of transition maps is included in either definition. [F1, given, step 1.1] ∎

Depends on

Used by · 13

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.