How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Stable Yoneda Waldhausen presentations without retract completion
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and fixed nested Grothendieck universes with . For every -small stable infinity-category there is a -small DHKS-saturated Waldhausen category with cofibration/weak-equivalence factorization and an equivalence , where is its class of weak equivalences. Its homotopy pushouts correspond to the finite pushouts of . No idempotent completion of is taken.
Here a Waldhausen category has a zero object, subcategories of cofibrations and weak equivalences containing the isomorphisms, every map from zero a cofibration, pushouts along cofibrations whose cobase-changed leg is a cofibration, and the gluing axiom: an objectwise weak equivalence between two such pushout spans induces a weak equivalence of pushouts. Both designated classes are closed under composition. DHKS-saturated means that a map is a weak equivalence exactly when it is invertible in the homotopy category of the infinity-localization. Factorization means that every map is a cofibration followed by a weak equivalence. A weakly exact functor preserves weak equivalences, zero up to equivalence and homotopy pushout squares. An exact Waldhausen functor preserves zero, cofibrations, weak equivalences and pushouts along cofibrations.
One possible is the full category of cofibrant -small spectral presheaves in BGT's projective simplicial model whose derived images are stably representable by objects of . This full category is -small; cofibrations and weak equivalences are inherited from the model category. The stable Yoneda image, rather than its retract closure, specifies the objects.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , Choice and the three universes as in the Statement. All presheaves and point-set spectra used in the construction are -small; the collection of those structures is formed in .
Goal: Verify the stated Waldhausen presentation from the precise imported model and localization inputs.
The Axiom of Choice and Grothendieck universe closure convention supply the choice and size conventions. The existence of the displayed universes is an assumption, not a consequence of Choice. External stable enhancement and smash product of spectra supplies the infinity-category, mapping-space, stable-spectrum and coherent finite-limit/colimit conventions. Model categories and Quillen adjunctions supplies model factorization, lifting, cofibrant/fibrant objects and weak equivalences.
Reference 0 supplies BGT's projective simplicial model and its equivalence with spectral presheaves on . Its weak equivalences are objectwise stable equivalences of spectra. The simplicial category is the simplicial realization used there. The stably representable cofibrant-fibrant objects form , and by Proposition 4.8. Stably representable here means equivalent to the spectral Yoneda presheaf for some ; the stable mapping spectrum has nth space . This input applies to every small stable , with no retract-completeness hypothesis.
Reference 1 supplies the interval criterion of Higher Algebra Proposition 1.3.4.7 and the fibrant-replacement argument in the proof of Theorem 1.3.4.20. Reference 2 supplies simplicial tensors, the enriched tensor adjunction, the corner axiom and its pushout-product formulation. In particular, restriction along a cofibration is a fibration of mapping Kan complexes into a fibrant target, and is a weak equivalence when that cofibration is trivial. Tensoring a cofibrant object with a simplex remains cofibrant; its map back to that object is a weak equivalence.
External input
Import the projective spectral-presheaf model and stable Yoneda equivalence [F1], and the simplicial-model and localization calculus [F2], with the hypotheses and reading limits of references 0–2. The proof below verifies closure, the restriction of that calculus and size for this particular presentation. The unnumbered paragraph after BGT Corollary 7.12 is not used as a source for detailed presentation properties.
Proof
Form using [F1] and let consist of all its cofibrant objects whose derived presheaves are stably representable. The spectral Yoneda embedding preserves finite limits: evaluation at each gives the mapping-spectrum functor, which preserves limits in its second variable. Since both and spectral presheaves are stable, finite limits and finite colimits coincide, so this embedding is exact. Its full replete image is therefore closed under zero and finite homotopy pushouts, without adding retracts. The model zero is cofibrant and belongs to . For a map in , model factorization has cofibrant , and is still stably representable because it is weakly equivalent to . For a span of cofibrant objects with a cofibration, its model pushout is cofibrant: is a cofibration. For every fibrant test object , the enriched adjunction identifies with . The restriction from is a fibration by [F2], so this is a homotopy pullback. Thus computes the ambient homotopy pushout and belongs to by exactness of Yoneda. The same mapping-space calculation shows that objectwise weak equivalences between these spans induce weak equivalences on pushouts, giving gluing. Closure of cofibrations under composition and pushout follows from their lifting characterization in [A1]; weak equivalences are closed under composition by two-out-of-three. These facts verify every stated Waldhausen axiom and factorization.
The infinity-localization of is the full subcategory modeled by its cofibrant-fibrant objects. To justify this restriction rather than assume it, regard as a full simplicial subcategory of the cofibrants of . It is closed under by [F2] and its defining weak-equivalence closure. Thus the four hypotheses of Proposition 1.3.4.7 hold: isomorphisms and two-out-of-three are inherited, interval objects satisfy the enriched adjunction, and interval projection is a weak equivalence. Every also has a trivial-cofibration fibrant replacement remaining in . Into any cofibrant-fibrant , this replacement induces an equivalence of mapping spaces by the corner axiom. Consequently the fibrant-replacement adjunction and marked-localization argument in the proof of Theorem 1.3.4.20 restrict to this full simplicial subcategory: their units are these weak equivalences and their mapping spaces into the fibrant objects are unchanged. They identify with the nerve of the full simplicial category of its cofibrant-fibrant objects. That category is exactly , so [F1] identifies the localization fully with . In particular it embeds fully in the underlying infinity-category of ; a map inverted in it is an equivalence of spectral presheaves, hence an objectwise equivalence of spectra, and therefore a projective model weak equivalence by [F1]. The converse holds by the defining localization, proving DHKS-saturation. Step 1.1 and this full embedding identify its homotopy pushouts with those in . Finally all -small presheaf structures and morphisms on the fixed small indexing category form sets in , by the universe closure convention; the full subcategory used here is therefore -small. The model operations are performed in and their results are retained in this full category, not discarded by taking an ordinary skeleton. Larger compatible universes are assumed if another category of these data is needed. Choice enters the imported realizations and replacements through [A1]; no functorial strict selection of as varies is claimed.
Depends on
- External stable enhancement and smash product of spectra
- Model categories and Quillen adjunctions
- Grothendieck universe closure convention
- The Axiom of Choice
- Blumberg–Gepner–Tabuada, A universal characterization of higher algebraic K-theory, arXiv:1001.2282v4 · §2.2, pp. 12–14; §4.2, Definition 4.7 and Proposition 4.8 with its proof, p. 26; Proposition 4.9 and its proof, p. 27
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra, September 18, 2017 · Proposition 1.3.4.7 and Example 1.3.4.8, pp. 110–111; Construction 1.3.4.18, Lemma 1.3.4.19 and Theorem 1.3.4.20, pp. 116–117; full proof of Theorem 1.3.4.20, p. 120
- Paul Goerss and Kristen Schemmerhorn, Model Categories and Simplicial Methods, arXiv:math/0609537v2 · §4.2, tensor and enriched adjunction formulas (4.2)–(4.4), p. 25; Definition 4.11, p. 26; Proposition 4.12 and Corollary 4.15/Remark 4.16, pp. 27–28
Dependency tree · 2 levels
Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The simplicial realization of a small stable infinity-category has a projective simplicial model of spectral presheaves. The full spectral category of stably representable cofibrant-fibrant presheaves has underlying infinity-category naturally equivalent to the original stable category. Its image lies in the exact spectral presheaves. This is the model and Yoneda input; closure and Waldhausen axioms for the chosen category of cofibrants are proved locally.
Hypotheses: Small stable infinity-category in compatible universes; projectively cofibrant-fibrant presheaves in the stated spectral model. Idempotent completeness is not required. Presheaf values may be taken in the larger V universe and their collection formed in W.
Reading limits: Read the cached primary arXiv:1001.2282v4 PDF text on 12 November 2026 at the listed passages; the versioned primary URL was also opened. Cached PDF SHA256: 08a8ae7fb5715d8269fd728c8a20d72403527aaefbeaa974b7040ec21d667a2d. The projective model, enrichment and Yoneda foundations are imported, not reconstructed. No scan inspection, complete-paper reading or independent acceptance is claimed.
A simplicial category with the four stated interval and weak-equivalence conditions has the same marked localization as its simplicial nerve after fibrant replacement. In a simplicial model category, ordinary localization of the cofibrants is equivalent to the nerve of the cofibrant-fibrant simplicial category; the proof uses interval tensors and a fibrant-replacement adjunction. The restriction of that proof to the selected homotopy-closed full subcategory is checked locally.
Hypotheses: For Proposition 1.3.4.7, the class contains isomorphisms, satisfies two-out-of-three, has enriched interval tensors and contains interval projections. Theorem 1.3.4.20 assumes a simplicial model category. It is not cited as a theorem about arbitrary full subcategories; the interval and replacement conditions are checked in Proof 2.1.
Reading limits: Read the live author-hosted PDF extraction on 12 November 2026: all four interval conditions, Example 1.3.4.8, Construction 1.3.4.18, Lemma 1.3.4.19 statement, Theorem 1.3.4.20 and its complete proof. The marked-simplicial-set foundations and proof of Proposition 1.3.4.7 are imported; no book-wide reading or local-byte hash is claimed.
Simplicial model categories have enriched tensor adjunctions and the corner mapping-space axiom, equivalently the pushout-product axiom. Cofibrant-to-fibrant mapping spaces compute the model homotopy mapping spaces. These statements supply the mapping-space and interval calculus used locally.
Hypotheses: A tensored and cotensored simplicial model category; cofibrant source and fibrant target for derived mapping spaces. The mapping-space corner uses a cofibration and a fibration and is trivial if either is trivial.
Reading limits: Read the live primary arXiv PDF extraction on 12 November 2026, §4.2 through Remark 4.16, including the enriched adjunction, full corner axiom and both pushout-product clauses. These model-category foundations are imported, not independently reconstructed. The interval consequence used here follows from Proposition 4.12. No full-paper reading is claimed.
Sources
- Blumberg–Gepner–Tabuada, A universal characterization of higher algebraic K-theory, arXiv:1001.2282v4 · §2.2, pp. 12–14; §4.2, Definition 4.7 and Proposition 4.8 with its proof, p. 26; Proposition 4.9 and its proof, p. 27
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra, September 18, 2017 · Proposition 1.3.4.7 and Example 1.3.4.8, pp. 110–111; Construction 1.3.4.18, Lemma 1.3.4.19 and Theorem 1.3.4.20, pp. 116–117; full proof of Theorem 1.3.4.20, p. 120
- Paul Goerss and Kristen Schemmerhorn, Model Categories and Simplicial Methods, arXiv:math/0609537v2 · §4.2, tensor and enriched adjunction formulas (4.2)–(4.4), p. 25; Definition 4.11, p. 26; Proposition 4.12 and Corollary 4.15/Remark 4.16, pp. 27–28