Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Classical and derived smooth Zariski sites over a classical base

PDF p. 8: Actual Chern and Whitney identities; PDF p. 11: Total virtual Chern class

Statement

Fix the compatible size bounds of the supplied motivic framework. Let S be a classical qcqs scheme, viewed as a derived scheme with discrete structure sheaf in that framework. Let SmScl be the ordinary category of smooth S-schemes with qcqs underlying schemes and all S-morphisms, equipped with the Zariski topology. Let SmSder be the smooth qcqs derived site of the framework. The discrete inclusion induces an equivalence of sites N(SmScl)≃SmSder, with inverse classical truncation t0. Here N means the nerve of an ordinary category, so this assertion includes all morphisms and their mapping spaces, not just objects.

Consequently restriction induces an equivalence of Zariski sheaves of spaces, and also of ordinary spectra, on the two sites. It preserves limits, colimits, the cartesian and induced pointed smash structures, and the symmetric monoidal structures on spectrum-valued sheaves. It identifies the representable pointed projective lines (PS1,∞) and their cotensors. Explicitly, a classical sheaf B extends as Bder(Y)=B(t0Y); this transports graded products, pointed classes, and equivalences computed using PY1 without changing their values on classical test schemes.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Quasi-compact and quasi-separated schemes and Smooth morphism of schemes specify the classical objects. External symmetric P¹ model, orientation criterion and fundamental stabilization specifies the source-native derived smooth Zariski site, sheaves of spaces, ordinary coefficient stabilization, and the projective line pointed at infinity. A Zariski covering here is a jointly surjective family of open immersions between objects of the indicated site; open subobjects carry the restricted structure sheaf. The base is classical; it need not be smooth over a field.

[F2]

Reference 0 supplies the affine-local derived geometry, its truncation and fully faithful discrete embedding. Reference 1 supplies the polynomial-functor description of animated rings, the flat homotopy-group formula, and the smoothness criterion. Both ring descriptions use the same category of finite polynomial rings and product-preserving functors to spaces; thus these inputs concern the derived geometry used here.

External input

The foundational premises in [F2] are imported at references 0 and 1 with their stated hypotheses and reading limits. Only the site comparison and transport argument below is proved locally. In particular, no claim about differentially smooth spectral schemes is imported or needed.

Proof

Given: The classical qcqs base S, the two sites, compatible size bounds, and [F1]–[F2].

Goal: Identify the full sites and transport the coefficient constructions.

1.1F1F2construct

For a smooth derived Y→S, choose affine charts Spec⁡B⊂Y over Spec⁡A⊂S. Since S is classical, πiA=0 for i>0. Smoothness and [F2] give πiB≅πiA⊗π0Aπ0B=0 for i>0, and a classically smooth map A→π0B. Thus these charts, and hence Y, are classical. Conversely a classical smooth morphism satisfies the same flatness criterion: both sides vanish in positive degrees and the degree-zero condition is ordinary flatness. It is therefore derived smooth. The fully faithful embedding in [F2] identifies every mapping space between classical schemes with the discrete set of classical morphisms; passing to the slice over the classical S retains this identification. This proves the categorical equivalence with inverse t0. The underlying spaces and affine opens are unchanged, so qcqs is preserved and reflected; open immersions and their joint surjectivity agree. Thus this is an equivalence of the stated Zariski sites.

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

Precomposition with this site equivalence and with t0 gives inverse equivalences on presheaves. Covering diagrams correspond, so their descent limit conditions correspond as well, and the equivalences restrict to sheaves. These inverse functors preserve all existing limits and colimits. They preserve pointwise products and the terminal object; after adding basepoints they preserve the smash pushouts. Applied levelwise to ordinary spectra they preserve the loop equivalences defining stabilization; the spectrum tensor is obtained from pointed smash by stabilization and colimits, so it too is preserved. Full faithfulness identifies each representable with the corresponding representable, including the usual PS1 and its infinity section. For classical Y, its derived product with PS1 over S is classical, since it is smooth over Y by [F1]–[F2], and its truncation is PY1; hence this is also the ordinary projective line over Y. Under the tensor-preserving equivalence the right adjoints defining projective-line cotensor correspond by their adjunctions. Therefore the explicit extension B∘t0 transports the actual graded products, pointed maps and projective-line equivalences, with every identity, composite and homotopy retained by functoriality.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Each result is drawn at its shortest distance from this item. Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them; this item has a heavier outline. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to two dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Adeel A. Khan and David Rydh, Virtual Cartier divisors and blow-ups (arXiv:1802.05702v2) · §§2.2.2–2.2.3 and footnote 2, printed p. 3

Derived rings are product-preserving space-valued functors on polynomial rings. Derived schemes are Zariski locally their spectra. Classical schemes embed fully faithfully, with essential image the schemes with discrete structure sheaf; affine truncation takes pi_0.

Hypotheses: The simplicial-commutative-ring derived geometry of SAG Chapter 25, with the stated size bounds; no Noetherian, characteristic-zero or regularity hypothesis.

Reading limits: Freshly read these complete passages and footnote 2 in the primary PDF extraction. The v2 extraction was opened; its later fetch failed, and the unversioned extraction explicitly identifies itself as v2 dated 16 May 2019. Screenshot requests failed. No page-image inspection, proof of the foundational embedding, or comparison with spectral differential smoothness is claimed.

Adeel A. Khan, Lectures on algebraic stacks (19 October 2023) · Theorem 7.2.2(ii), pp. 44–45; Proposition 8.1.1 and Definition 8.1.2, p. 50; Definition/Proposition 8.1.6(ii) and Definition 8.1.7, p. 51

Animation gives the same polynomial-functor model of derived rings. Flat maps satisfy pi_i(B)=pi_i(A) tensor over pi_0(A) with pi_0(B); smooth means flat with smooth pi_0 map.

Hypotheses: Animated commutative rings, identified with the polynomial-functor model above; all i are nonnegative. Smoothness is the derived-ring notion, applied on affine charts.

Reading limits: Freshly read the stated theorem and definitions, including the whole flatness criterion and smoothness clause, in the primary PDF extraction. Screenshot requests failed. These foundational results are imported, not proved here; the cotangent and deformation theory in the surrounding chapters is not used or reconstructed.

Sources