How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Low-degree consequences of a weight-one comparison
PDF p. 4: equation (2.3)
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the site-size bounds of Cohomology of shifted Nisnevich units. Let be a qcqs scheme over a field, and suppose a morphism has cofiber supported in degrees . Then it induces for . In particular the motivic groups are zero for , global units for , and the Picard group for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , the cofiber bound, Choice, and the site-size bounds.
Goal: Derive the displayed cohomology identifications.
The cofiber bound gives an isomorphism on cohomology through degree three (Exact range of a cofiber connectivity bound).
The source groups and their low degrees are identified in Cohomology of shifted Nisnevich units. Motivic cohomology is cohomology of the target complex (Motivic complexes and cohomology).
Proof
Apply [F1] to . By [F2], the source of the resulting degree- isomorphism is and the target is .
Substitute the computations of [F2] for . This gives zero, units and the Picard group in the stated ranges, retaining the assumptions required by the supplier.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.