Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The EM weight-one Picard normalization is positive identity

PDF p. 9: Actual low-weight motivic projections and their normalization; PDF p. 10: Lemma 5.2, smooth-case first-Chern normalization

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed compatible universe and site-size bounds of the supplied constructions.

On Sm_k for any field k, write S=Ω∞Fil¹K and identify Ω∞gr¹K with BGm by the canonical EM c₁ comparison. Let κ:BGm→S lift L↦[L]−1. Then the based map q₁κ:BGm→BGm is identity as a map of Nisnevich stacks, hence on both the Picard classes and their automorphism units. This identifies the sign of the actual projection and not merely its target group.

Facts & Assumptions

[A1]

Assume the Axiom of Choice as formulated in The Axiom of Choice and the stated universe and site-size bounds. They are inherited when applying the determinant/one-type input in [F2] at step 1.2. The stack comparison is on a universe-bounded smooth big Nisnevich site; derived sections use the compatible small sites. The Laurent-unit calculation and the integer sign test add no further choice principle.

Given: The normalized maps and the field hypothesis in the Statement. All maps and homotopies below are in pointed Nisnevich sheaves of spaces on Smk. Assume Choice and the universe and site-size bounds in [A1].

Goal: Identify the chosen lift with the normalized lift, then prove the identity on the whole line-bundle stack.

[F1]

External EM low-weight maps with fixed positive normalization supplies the particular pointed lift a of L↦1−[L], the canonical identification Ω∞gr⁡1K≃BGm, and q1(−a)(O(−1))=c1(O(−1)). It also fixes Pic⁡(Pk1)=Z with generator c1(O(1)). This fact does not assert that an arbitrary lift is −a.

[F2]

External determinant and pointed one-type inputs supplies the fully faithful classification of pointed connected one-types by sheaves of groups. In particular pointed maps BGm→BGm correspond to sheaf-group endomorphisms of Gm.

[F3]

Weight zero is the locally constant rank function, including its weight-zero comparison and stage computation, identifies q0 with rank and uses the actual fiber sequence Fil⁡1K→K→gr⁡0K. On smooth schemes the comparison of [F1] identifies the zeroth space of the last term with the locally constant integer sheaf: its positive homotopy groups are negative cohomology groups of the degree-zero constant sheaf and vanish.

Proof

1.1F3given

Put T=Ω∞gr⁡0K and f:BGm→Ω∞K, L↦[L]−1. By [F3], T is the discrete locally constant integer sheaf and q0f is the zero map, since every line bundle has rank one. Since Ω∞ preserves fibers, S is the fiber over zero of Ω∞K→T. Applying the pointed mapping-space functor from BGm identifies the space of lifts of this fixed f with the space of paths from q0f to zero in Map⁡∗(BGm,T). The latter mapping space is discrete because T is zero-truncated. The path space in question is therefore contractible.

1.2F2givenA1

By [F2], q1κ corresponds to an endomorphism h:Gm→Gm. The sheaf Gm is represented on Smk by Spec⁡k[t,t−1], so Yoneda identifies its underlying natural map with a unit of k[t,t−1]. Every such unit is btn for b∈k× and n∈Z: the highest and lowest exponents of a product add over a field, and a product equal to one forces both factors to have a single exponent. Preservation of the identity gives b=1. Hence h(u)=un, and the associated pushforward of torsors sends a line bundle L to L⊗n. This Laurent-unit calculation uses the field hypothesis.

2.1F1step 1.1

Inversion in the infinite loop space sends the particular lift a in [F1] to a pointed lift −a of f. Both the specified κ and −a are thus lifts of the same fixed map. By step 1.1 they agree up to pointed homotopy over Ω∞K. Consequently the normalized evaluation from [F1] applies to q1κ, giving q1κ(O(−1))=c1(O(−1)).

3.1F1F2step 2.1step 1.2∎

Apply step 1.2 to O(−1) on Pk1. Step 2.1 says its image is O(−1), while step 1.2 gives O(−n). The specified infinite cyclic Picard group in [F1] therefore forces n=1. Full faithfulness in [F2] identifies the whole pointed stack map q1κ with the identity, including its action u↦u on automorphism units. The sign is inherited from the actual normalized projection 1−[O(−1)]↦+c1(O(1)), rather than chosen through a new target identification.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.