How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Localization of a presented divisor class group
PDF p. 13: Divisibility of the normalization Picard group
Statement
Let be a set, , an abelian group, and a homomorphism. Let be restriction to and put . Then the natural sequence is exact. Here denotes , and the first map extends by zero and passes to the quotient.
Facts & Assumptions
Restriction is surjective with kernel the extensions by zero of (Restriction of finite-support divisors).
A surjective homomorphism induces a surjection with kernel for every subgroup (Quotienting a compatible surjection).
Given: The data in the statement.
Goal: Prove the stated cokernel sequence exact.
Proof
Apply [F2] to , , and . Since , the induced map is the displayed map of cokernels and is surjective.
By [F1] and the kernel formula in [F2], its kernel consists exactly of classes represented by divisors supported in . These are the image of , proving exactness.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.