Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Elmanto–Morrow rational comparison cofiber

PDF p. 6: EM23 Theorem 4.10(4)

Statement

For a quasi-compact quasi-separated Q-scheme X and integer j ≥ 0, Elmanto–Morrow supply a natural map in D(Z)

Z(j)_mot(X) → Z(j)_cdh(X)

whose cofiber is isomorphic to the underlying complex of a complex of Q-vector spaces. The first complex is the Elmanto–Morrow complex of Motivic complexes and cohomology, restricted along Q → k when X is a k-scheme. The second is the cdh-local motivic complex of the cited paper on its category of qcqs Q-schemes. The map is its canonical motivic-to-cdh map. No identification with evaluation on the separately chosen small cdh site is asserted.

External input

This is the rational-cofiber consequence of the fundamental fiber sequence in Elmanto–Morrow Theorem 4.10(3), equivalently of its pullback square in part (2): the derived de Rham terms on the right are rational. The authors explicitly use that rationality to deduce part (4). A quasi-compact scheme has every open cover admitting a finite subcover; quasi-separated means its diagonal is quasi-compact. The assertion is imported with the hypotheses and reading limits in the reference; the underlying construction and proof are not reconstructed here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A qcqs Q-scheme X and j ≥ 0.

Goal: Obtain the canonical comparison map with rational cofiber.

[F1]

The cited external input supplies the natural comparison map and its rational cofiber under these hypotheses.

Proof

1.1F1given

Apply [F1] to X and j.

2.1F1givenstep 1.1∎

This yields precisely the stated map and rational-cofiber property.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

External dependencies

Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes · Theorem 4.10(2)–(4), printed pp. 20–21, and proof of part (4)

For every qcqs Q-scheme X and integer j, the natural map from the weight-j motivic complex to the weight-j cdh-local motivic complex has rational cofiber; in particular the map modulo every positive integer is an equivalence.

Hypotheses: X is quasi-compact and quasi-separated over Q; j is an integer. The finite-coefficient consequence here uses a positive integer.

Reading limits: The theorem statement and the displayed proof of part (4) were read. The construction of the cdh-local filtration and the underlying derived de Rham comparison proofs were not reconstructed or fully traced.

Sources