How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The actual enhanced restriction sequence and its K fiber
PDF p. 7: Zariski locality; PDF p. 15: Localization diagram
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and fix the suitable universes of the supplied derived and K-theory constructions. For qcqs , quasi-compact open and closed complement , the actual sequence of essentially small stable categories is exact: the induced enhanced Verdier quotient becomes equivalent to after idempotent completion. Applying the supplied nonconnective functor gives a natural fiber sequence , in all integer homotopy degrees.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated schemes and actual enhanced inclusion and restriction, with their zero composite. Assume the Axiom of Choice and use the universes fixed in the Statement.
Goal: Apply the precise categorical localization criterion, then the chosen nonconnective functor.
Choice is inherited when invoking the actual enhanced sequence in [F1], the quotient comparison in [F2], and the specified nonconnective K-theory interface in [F3]. The Axiom of Choice
The exact restriction kernel and its denominators supplies the actual exact functors, full inclusion and nullhomotopy. Essential smallness of perfect and supported categories supplies small equivalent models and idempotent completeness.
Full faithfulness of the perfect triangulated quotient and Every open perfect complex is a retract of a restriction establish the induced triangulated quotient equivalence after completion.
External enhanced quotient criterion and localizing nonconnective K imports BGT's enhanced criterion and the localizing property of the same used in Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes.
Proof
Use equivalent small models, or the equivalent essentially small domain fixed by the supplied K interface. Apply BGT Proposition 5.15 with to the actual sequence in [F1]. All categories are stable and therefore admit finite colimits; all functors are exact and preserve them. The composite is zero, the first arrow is fully faithful, and the triangulated quotient is an equivalence after idempotent completion by [F2]. Thus BGT yields the enhanced exact sequence and the claimed completion equivalence for its actual quotient functor. The use of homotopy categories is legitimate because an actual exact restriction functor was specified before applying the criterion.
By [F3], applying yields a cofiber sequence, hence a fiber sequence in spectra. Its terms and maps are exactly , and by their supplied definitions. The construction is natural for restriction diagrams preserving the indicated supports, because quotient, , and its mapping-spectrum description are functorial on the actual diagrams. No connective truncation is performed, so the fiber sequence and its long exact sequence retain all integer groups.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The exact restriction kernel and its denominators
- Full faithfulness of the perfect triangulated quotient
- Every open perfect complex is a retract of a restriction
- External enhanced quotient criterion and localizing nonconnective K
- Nonconnective K theory of perfect complexes
- Essential smallness of perfect and supported categories
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.