How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Common projective complements and cancellation by free modules
Statement
Let be a commutative ring with unit. Call a finite projective -module cancellative if, for every finite projective and every integer , implies . This is equivalent to cancellation of an arbitrary common finite projective summand: implies .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The data and hypotheses in the statement.
Goal: Establish the stated conclusion.
The choice-free module clause states that every finite projective has a finite projective complement with . Finite projective complements
Proof
If is cancellative in the free-summand sense and , add the complement to both sides. Associativity converts this into , so .
Conversely is finite projective and can itself be used as the common summand . Thus cancellation of arbitrary common summands implies the free-summand definition. This also proves the definition has the claimed precise meaning.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.