How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Compatible local torsor sections determine an isomorphism
PDF p. 4: Weight one units and Picard identification
Statement
Let be torsors under a sheaf of abelian groups on a site, and suppose sections and over a cover of the terminal object have the same transition units, with the convention of Local sections of a torsor give a cocycle. Then there is a unique equivariant isomorphism carrying every to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The two torsors and matching local sections.
Goal: Construct the equivariant isomorphism.
Torsors are locally nonempty sheaves with simply transitive actions, as in Local sections of a torsor give a cocycle.
Proof
Over each , send to . Simple transitivity makes this a well-defined equivariant bijection, natural after restriction. On overlaps the common transition unit gives the same map from either index.
The sheaf condition glues these local maps, and glues their local inverses, to mutually inverse global morphisms. Any equivariant map taking to agrees with the constructed map locally, hence globally.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.