How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Frames and their transition units
PDF p. 4: Weight one units and Picard identification
Statement
Let be a sheaf of commutative rings on a site, and let be a sheaf of -modules locally isomorphic to . A frame over is an -module isomorphism . The frames form a torsor under : they form a sheaf of sets, have local sections, and whenever two frames exist over the same object there is a unique unit carrying one to the other. If frames are chosen on a cover, their transition units defined by satisfy on triple overlaps.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and as stated.
Goal: Establish the frame torsor and its transition equation.
The units form a sheaf by Units in a sheaf of rings form a sheaf.
Proof
A module map from to is determined by the image of . If it is an isomorphism, composing with another frame's inverse gives an automorphism of , necessarily multiplication by a unique unit. Compatible maps glue as maps of sheaves; compatible local inverses glue as well, so frames satisfy the sheaf condition. Local freeness supplies local frames.
On a triple overlap, . Uniqueness of the unit in step 1.1 gives . Thus frames have the stated torsor and transition properties.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.