How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reindexing a chain complex cohomologically
PDF p. 4: Property (4): cycle-complex convention
Statement
Let C be a chain complex of abelian groups, with differential d from to . Define the cochain complex by = , with differential d in each degree. Then is canonically .
A chain complex has consecutive differentials whose composite is zero; its homology is the kernel modulo the image. A cochain complex is defined analogously, with differential increasing degree, and its cohomology is the corresponding kernel modulo image.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A chain complex C and an integer q.
Goal: Identify the cohomology of its reindexing with its homology.
Proof
The reindexed differential goes from to , and its square is zero because d squared is zero in C. Thus is a cochain complex.
Its degree-q kernel and incoming image are exactly the degree-(−q) cycles and boundaries of C. Their quotients are therefore identical, giving the claimed canonical isomorphism.