How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Chern-compatible presentation transports the exact fibers
Statement
Let be the defined map. Suppose are sets, and are bijections, and is a map satisfying . For , let be its unique preimage under . The restriction of is a bijection from onto .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sets and maps in the Statement, including the actual equality .
Goal: Produce the asserted fiber bijection.
The fiber of over is . Fixed determinant isolates the actual Chern fiber
Proof
If , then . Injectivity of yields . Conversely, if , its unique preimage under satisfies , so .
The restrictions of and its inverse therefore map the two specified subsets into each other. Their composites remain the respective identity maps because they were inverse on the ambient sets. This proves the bijection of fibers. Mere abstract bijections of the ambient sets without the compatibility equality would not imply this conclusion.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Aravind Asok and Jean Fasel, A cohomological classification of vector bundles on smooth affine threefolds · Theorem 1, p. 2; §6, pp. 22–26