How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The plus presheaf is separated
Statement
For every set-valued presheaf F on a small site, F+ is separated. Moreover, if two sections of F agree after restriction along every arrow of a covering sieve, their images in F+ agree.
Facts & Assumptions
The site, matching families and separatedness are defined in Small sites and the plus construction.
Cover intersections cover by Covering sieves admit common refinements, and F+ is a presheaf by The plus construction is a presheaf.
Proof
Given: A covering sieve R on X and two elements of F+(X) with equal restrictions along every arrow of R.
Goal: Prove their equality and the stated property of η_F.
Represent the two elements by matching families s and t on covering sieves S and T. For each f in R, equality of the restricted classes means that they agree on a covering sieve of arrows into dom f after pulling back S and T. Let E be the sieve of arrows h in S ∩ T for which . For every f in R, contains such a covering sieve and therefore covers. Transitivity shows that E covers X.
The representatives agree on E, so their classes agree. Hence F+ is separated. If two sections of F agree on R, their restrictions on the maximal sieve agree on R, so their η_F images agree by the definition of the equivalence relation.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.