How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalence of the weight-zero pullback projection
PDF p. 4: Weight zero
Statement
The canonical source map is an equivalence on every qcqs -scheme, and hence after restriction to qcqs -schemes. This uses its actual pullback construction, rather than choosing equivalences from a comparison of groups.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the statement.
Goal: Establish the displayed construction or conclusion with its actual maps.
Exact source weight-zero and constant-sheaf input imports the cartesian squares and right equivalences in EM Examples4.11 and4.26, with their actual maps.
Proof
The exact source input [F1] gives the source cartesian square with left projection and an equivalence on the right vertical arrow. A base change of an equivalence is an equivalence: the pullback of maps equivalently to , since replacing by identifies the pullback with . Apply this in the stable derived category to that square.
This gives precisely its left projection , naturally in the source object. Restrict this actual map by Prime-field restriction preserves actual comparison diagrams. The same equivalence holds at each qcqs -scheme.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.