Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Omega towers and the suspension index

PDF p. 3: Filtered S1 spectra: stable enhancement prerequisites

Statement

Let Y=(Yn≃ΩYn+1)n≥0 be a coherent Omega tower of pointed spaces and let Y be its corresponding object of Sp. Put πk(Y)=π0Map⁡Sp(S[k],Y). For every integer k and n≥0 with n+k≥2 there are compatible natural isomorphisms πk(Y)≅πn+k(Yn)≅Gk(Y). The tail (Yn+1)n≥0 represents Y[1], and πk(Y[1])≅πk−1(Y).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Y, k and n as stated. Here [1] is suspension and [−1] its inverse; Map⁡ denotes the mapping space in Sp.

Goal: Compare tower and enhanced groups and determine the suspension index.

[F1]

The stable enhancement gives the tower equivalence, Ω∞(Y[n])≃Yn, stability and the adjunction Σ∞⊣Ω∞, with S=Σ∞S0. External stable enhancement and smash product of spectra

[F2]

Cofinal tails of sequential group systems have canonically isomorphic colimits. Cofinal tails and level invariance of stable groups

Proof

1.1F1given

Stability makes suspension and loops inverse. Hence Map⁡(S[k],Y)≃Map⁡(S,Y[−k])≃Ω∞(Y[−k]). Since Y[−k]≃Ωn+k(Y[n]), taking components gives πk(Y)≅πn+k(Yn). These are group isomorphisms, with the abelian group law detected in degree n+k≥2. Naturality of the adjunction makes them compatible with the tower maps.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Each bonding map in the tower is an isomorphism on the relevant groups because Yn≃ΩYn+1. Therefore the colimit is canonically any sufficiently late stage group, compatibly with step 1.1. This proves πk(Y)≅Gk(Y).

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Evaluation gives Ω∞((Y[1])[n])≃Ω∞(Y[n+1])≃Yn+1 compatibly with the loop maps, so the tail represents Y[1]. Applying step 1.1 to the tail identifies its kth group with the (k−1)st group of Y. This proves the suspension formula.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.