How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The low-dimensional quotient follows from the stage sequence
PDF p. 11: Proposition 5.5; pp. 11–12
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed site and universe bounds of the supplied constructions. Let be algebraically closed and a normal finite-type -scheme. If , the actual projection induces an isomorphism If , the third image subgroup itself is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Assume the Axiom of Choice as formulated in The Axiom of Choice and the stated size bounds. Choice and the existing size bounds are inherited from the stage-vanishing and stage-to-image premises in [F2] at steps 1.1–2.1 and the perfect-image comparison in [F3] at step 2.1.
Stage projections, kernels and image groups gives the exact sequence ending in .
High filtration vanishing says for and , and for . Graded filtration projections identifies the second stage with its image under the present normal hypotheses.
The perfect image filtration has the stated second projection and kernel identifies the actual transported map with and its kernel with the third image subgroup under the stated Choice and site/universe size hypotheses.
Proof
Given: in the stated normal finite-type algebraically closed scope, of dimension at most three, with Choice and the fixed site and universe bounds as in [A1].
Goal: Obtain the quotient without a later surjectivity consumer.
Since , [F2] makes the final obstruction group zero. Exactness of [F1] makes the second-stage projection surjective. Transfer this assertion to using its stage-image isomorphism in [F2].
Its kernel is and its value is by [F3]. The first isomorphism theorem proves the displayed quotient identification with that exact sign. If , then and [F2] makes the third stage's , hence its image subgroup, zero. No later second-Chern-surjectivity proposition is used.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.