Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The actual composite and its objectwise cofiber

PDF p. 5: Prime-to-characteristic comparison

Statement

Let F=Q or Fp, let j be a nonnegative integer and let n≥1 be an integer invertible in F. Work with D(Z)-valued presheaves on all qcqs F-schemes. Write Mj=Z(j)mot,F for the source motivic functor, Bj=RΓet(−,μn⊗j) for the derived small-étale coefficient functor, and Z(j)cdh,F for the source cdh-local classical-input complex. The slash denotes the objectwise derived quotient A/n=cofib⁡(n:A→A)=A⊗LZ/n. Use the source qcqs cdh site generated by Nisnevich covers and abstract blowup families whose closed immersion and proper morphism are finitely presented. Here Lcdh is the source ordinary stable-valued sheafification, left adjoint to inclusion of derived cdh sheaves satisfying covering descent. Let θj:Z(j)cdh,F/n→∼Lcdhτ≤jBj be the source natural comparison. The map of interest is the specified composite fj:Mj/n→αjZ(j)cdh,F/n→θjLcdhτ≤jBj→ϵjBj. For each qcqs F-scheme X, its actual cofiber Cj(X)=cofib⁡(fj(X)) has Ha(Cj(X))=0 for a≤j. This is an objectwise statement about this composite, not only vanishing of its cdh sheafification.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the statement.

Goal: Establish the displayed construction or conclusion with its actual maps.

[F2]

Exact objectwise cofiber bound for the canonical source composite supplies the exact objectwise cofiber range for this same composite. Its qualification about the printed fiber sentence in the source proof is retained; that sentence is not used to derive a cofiber range.

Proof

1.1F1F2construct

The induced-map lemma in [F1] supplies ϵj by its unit equation, the finite-quotient lemma supplies αj, and the factorization input supplies θj. Their displayed composite is an actual natural transformation on the specified qcqs F-category. The source-map identification imported in [F2] identifies it with the canonical comparison of EM Theorem 4.33(1).

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

Apply the exact objectwise cofiber assertion imported in [F2] to this very composite. Its hypotheses are qcqs X/F, j≥0, n>0 invertible in F, exactly the present ones. It yields the displayed vanishing. This step uses the substantial objectwise source theorem explicitly; neither the adjunction nor a bare cdh-local equivalence is being substituted for that theorem.

Depends on

Used by · 3

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.