How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Characteristic-zero coefficient vanishing and torsion freeness
PDF p. 6: Proof of Proposition 2.6, multiplication by p sequence and conclusion
Statement
Let be an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero and let be an affine threefold over . For every prime , choosing a primitive th root of unity in gives an isomorphism Consequently multiplication by is injective on for every prime , and this group is torsion-free.
Here affine threefold means , with a finitely generated -algebra and , as in Article scheme conventions; no smoothness, reducedness, or irreducibility is assumed. The motivic groups are the cohomology of the Elmanto–Morrow weight-three complex, with finite coefficients formed by derived tensor product after evaluation, as defined in Motivic complexes and cohomology. The étale group is the cohomology of the small étale site of with the constant sheaf . Torsion-free means that no nonzero element is annihilated by a positive integer.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An algebraically closed characteristic-zero field , an affine finite-type -scheme of dimension three, and a prime .
Goal: Establish the displayed isomorphism and vanishing, the coefficient-sequence injectivity, and torsion-freeness.
Motivic complexes and cohomology defines , , and .
External canonical top-weight motivic-to-syntomic comparison gives, for finite-type over an algebraically closed field and weight , an equivalence from the actual finite-coefficient motivic complex to when is invertible in the field. Here is the étale sheaf of th roots of unity and is its -fold tensor power over .
A chosen root trivializes the actual Tate coefficient on the slice says that a chosen primitive th root induces an isomorphism of étale sheaves , sending to . External affine étale vanishing at invertible primes gives for under the present affine, finite-type and invertibility hypotheses.
Derived finite coefficients and the Bockstein sequence supplies the exact sequence , where . Primewise detection of torsion says an abelian group is torsion-free if multiplication by every prime is injective.
Proof
Characteristic zero makes invertible in . Since is algebraically closed, splits in ; its roots are distinct because its derivative has no common root with it. The group of its roots has order , so any nonidentity root has order . Thus the chosen-root hypothesis of [F3] holds.
Apply [F2] with . Using [F1] and taking degree-five cohomology gives an isomorphism from to . The inverse of the coefficient isomorphism in [F3] identifies this with . The latter identification depends on the choice of .
By affine étale vanishing in [F3], because . Step 2.1 therefore proves both the displayed isomorphism and the vanishing.
The first term of the exact sequence in [F4] is zero by [F1] and step 3.1. Exactness therefore makes multiplication by injective on .
The argument applies to every prime . The primewise criterion in [F4] now shows that is torsion-free. This proves all assertions.
Depends on
- Article scheme conventions
- Motivic complexes and cohomology
- A chosen root trivializes the actual Tate coefficient on the slice
- External canonical top-weight motivic-to-syntomic comparison
- External affine étale vanishing at invertible primes
- Derived finite coefficients and the Bockstein sequence
- Primewise detection of torsion
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
Sources
- Jean Fasel and Maria Yakerson, Vector bundles on singular surfaces and threefolds · p. 6, proof of Proposition 2.6