Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-generatedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Line bundles are detected off codimension two

PDF p. 10: Injectivity of Picard restriction in Lemma 5.2

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let X be a noetherian normal scheme and let j:U↪X be an open immersion whose image contains every point of codimension at most one in its irreducible component. Then restriction Pic⁡(X)→Pic⁡(U) is injective. More precisely, a trivialization OU→∼L∣U of a line bundle L determines a section of L∣U and an inverse section of its dual; both extend uniquely to X, and their evaluation product is 1.

A noetherian normal scheme is a scheme with a finite cover by spectra of noetherian rings and with all local rings integrally closed domains. The codimension of a point in its irreducible component is the supremum of the lengths of chains of strict specializations from the component's generic point to that point. A line bundle is an OX-module locally isomorphic to OX; its dual is L∨=HomOX(L,OX). The Picard group consists of isomorphism classes of line bundles, with tensor product as its operation and [OX] as identity. Restriction sends a class to the class of its restriction.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under the stated hypotheses and the Axiom of Choice, restriction is an isomorphism of sheaves of rings OX→∼j∗OU (Functions extend across codimension two).

[F2]

The Picard group has the stated tensor-product law, identity and dual inverses (Picard group of a scheme).

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed as required by [F1] (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: X, U and j as in the statement, the Axiom of Choice, and a line bundle L on X.

Goal: Extend a trivialization on U as stated and prove injectivity of restriction on Picard groups.

1.1F1A1given

For any line bundle M on X, the natural restriction morphism M→j∗(M∣U) is an isomorphism. Indeed, on every open set V where M≅OV, it identifies with the restriction of the isomorphism in [F1] to V. Such opens cover X, and a morphism of sheaves that is an isomorphism locally is an isomorphism: its local inverses agree on overlaps and glue. In particular, sections of M∣U extend uniquely to sections of M on X. The dual L∨ is also a line bundle, since the dual of a local copy of OX is a local copy of OX.

2.1F1step 1.1construct

Suppose ϕ:OU→∼L∣U is a trivialization. Set sU=ϕ(1) and let tU be the section of L∨∣U corresponding to ϕ−1; thus tU(sU)=1. By step 1.1, these sections extend uniquely to s∈Γ(X,L) and t∈Γ(X,L∨). The evaluation t(s) restricts to 1 on U, so [F1] implies t(s)=1 on X. Locally write s=ae and t=be∨ in a basis e and its dual. Then ba=1, so the maps OX→L, 1↦s, and L→OX defined by t are inverse isomorphisms locally, hence globally.

3.1F2step 2.1∎

Restriction respects tensor products and the identity by their local constructions, so it is a homomorphism of the Picard groups in [F2]. If a class restricts to the identity, its representative admits a trivialization on U; step 2.1 makes that representative trivial on X. Thus the kernel is trivial, and the restriction homomorphism is injective.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.