Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Second stage with integral curve support

PDF p. 16: Proof of Theorem 6.7, supported second-stage exact sequence

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed universe bounds of the completed comparison suppliers. Let k be a perfect field, U a smooth finite-type k-scheme of pure dimension three, and C⊂U an integral closed curve of codimension two. In particular, this includes the curve in the smooth locus used in Theorem 6.7 over an algebraically closed field. Neither smoothness nor normality of C is assumed.

Use the actual Elmanto–Morrow motivic filtration F∙K and write KC(U)=fib⁡(K(U)→K(U∖C)),FCjK(U)=fib⁡(FjK(U)→FjK(U∖C)). Here fib⁡ is the homotopy fiber of the restriction map, and K0(U/(U∖C)) means π0KC(U). The actual augmentation ϵ2:FC2K(U)→KC(U) is an equivalence. Thus its induced isomorphism identifies π0FC2K(U) with K0(U/(U∖C)), as in the article. Under this identification there is an exact sequence π0FC3K(U)⟶K0(U/(U∖C))⟶Hmot,C4,2(U,Z)≅Z[C]≅Z. The second arrow is the actual stage-to-layer projection composed with (π0ϵ2)−1. The generator [C] is the positive fundamental cycle in the supported cycle group. On a supported perfect complex E, the arrow sends its class to ∑n(−1)nℓOU,ηHn(E)η times [C], where η is the generic point of C and ℓ denotes module length. It extends additively to virtual classes. This group is supported cohomology, not the image of [C] in the Chow group of U.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The field, smooth threefold, integral closed curve, choice and universe hypotheses in the statement, and the actual augmented motivic tower and restriction maps.

Goal: Identify the second supported stage with supported K-theory and prove the displayed exact sequence, including the actual map and its positive generator.

[F1]

Smooth rank, first Chern, determinant and supported positive leading cycle applies to this perfect-field smooth pair with AC. It supplies the actual equivalence ϵ2, identifies π0gr⁡C2K(U) with Hmot,C4,2(U,Z)=Z[C], and identifies the actual projection after inverse augmentation with the alternating generic-length map and positive generator. Its proof uses AC and the stated fixed universe bounds.

[F2]

Support fibers commute with graded triangles constructs the supported filtered tower by restriction fibers and its graded cofiber sequence. Motivic graded pieces and spectral sequence supplies the natural actual motivic graded triangle; Motivic and filtered K theory with support fixes its supported cohomological indexing.

Proof

technique · Apply the homotopy exact sequence of the supported graded cofiber sequence and transport it along the actual augmentation
1.1F1given

The hypotheses of [F1] hold: k is perfect, U is smooth finite type and pure three-dimensional, and C is integral, closed and codimension two. Therefore the actual augmentation ϵ2 is an equivalence and induces an isomorphism on π0. This identifies the second supported stage with K0(U/(U∖C)); the identification is the map induced by ϵ2, not an equality inferred from abstract group isomorphism.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

By [F2], taking restriction fibers of the actual weight-two graded triangle gives the cofiber sequence FC3K(U)⟶FC2K(U)⟶gr⁡C2K(U). Its long exact homotopy sequence is exact at π0FC2K(U). By [F1] and the indexing in [F2], the last term on π0 is Hmot,C4,2(U,Z)=Z[C]. Transporting the middle term along the isomorphism in step 1.1 gives the displayed exact sequence.

3.1F1step 2.1∎

The transported second arrow is precisely the actual projection after (π0ϵ2)−1. The normalization in [F1] computes it as alternating generic length times the positive supported cycle [C]; the isomorphism Z[C]≅Z sends [C] to 1. This identifies the arrow and sign, and completes the proof without requiring purity for the possibly singular curve.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources