Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Representable cdh sheaves and seminormalization

PDF p. 5: Proof of Lemma 2.4, HK18 Theorem 1.4

Statement

Let k be a perfect field, and let X,Y be separated finite-type k-schemes. Write hY(Z)=Hom⁡k(Z,Y) and hYcdh for its sheafification on the big cdh site of separated finite-type k-schemes. Then there is a natural bijection hYcdh(X)≅Hom⁡k(Xsn,Y). If X is seminormal, this identifies hYcdh(X) with Hom⁡k(X,Y).

A perfect field is one for which every algebraic extension is separable. A finite-type k-scheme has a finite affine cover by spectra of finitely generated k-algebras; separatedness means its diagonal is a closed immersion. The cdh topology and sheafification are those in Completely decomposed proper covers and the cdh topology, and the seminormalization Xsn→X is the subintegral map with seminormal source described in Seminormality and seminormalization. A subintegral map is integral, bijective on points and induces residue-field isomorphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A perfect field k and separated finite-type k-schemes X,Y.

Goal: Establish the displayed bijection and its seminormal specialization.

[F1]

The Huber–Kelly external input gives the displayed natural bijection for separated finite-type schemes over a noetherian Nagata base. It explicitly includes the spectrum of a perfect field among such bases. Huber–Kelly representable cdh sheafification input

[F2]

For a finite-type scheme over a field, its seminormalization is subintegral, has seminormal source and is finite over the reduction. A reduced seminormal scheme admits no nontrivial finite subintegral morphism from a reduced scheme. Seminormality and seminormalization

[F3]

A set-valued cdh sheaf sends finite subintegral morphisms of separated finite-type schemes to bijections. Cdh sheaves invert finite subintegral maps

Proof

technique · Apply the imported theorem and then specialize its source
1.1F1given

The base S=Spec⁡k satisfies the hypotheses of [F1], and X,Y satisfy its separated finite-type hypotheses. Applying [F1] gives the displayed natural bijection.

1.2F2given

Suppose X is seminormal. It is reduced by [F2], so its seminormalization is a finite subintegral map from a reduced scheme to X. The finite-morphism criterion in [F2] makes Xsn→X an isomorphism. Precomposition with its inverse therefore identifies Hom⁡k(Xsn,Y) with Hom⁡k(X,Y).

2.1F3step 1.1step 1.2∎

The map Xsn→X also induces a bijection on sections of any cdh sheaf by [F3]; this records the descent compatibility used in the specialization. Combining steps 1.1 and 1.2 proves both assertions.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 3 levels

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.

Sources