How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External perfect-field Tate cancellation
PDF p. 7: Lemma2.9: smooth-point supported purity
Statement
Let be perfect. For any , tensoring with induces the natural bijection The effective category and integral coefficients are the classical category used by the completed Gysin input. This is valid in every characteristic without a resolution-of-singularities hypothesis.
Source contract
Given: A perfect field and objects of the stated effective motive category.
Goal: Import precisely the full-faithfulness needed for coefficient cancellation.
[F1] Voevodsky2010 Corollary4.10 supplies exactly this natural map and bijection.
External input
Import [F1]. Its deep proof is not locally reconstructed. MVW Theorem16.25's printed proof assumes resolution of singularities, while Remark16.26 explicitly points to the perfect-field theorem; the present import uses the actual published perfect-field result rather than silently discarding the earlier hypothesis.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.
External dependencies
For perfect k, tensoring both objects in DM_eff_-(k) by the Tate motive induces a natural bijection on Hom sets.
Hypotheses: Perfect field; arbitrary K,L in the stated effective motive category; integral coefficients in the source. No characteristic-zero or resolution-of-singularities restriction.
Reading limits: Read actual published PDF introduction, full Corollaries4.9/4.10 and their complete displayed proofs. The proof cites the main cancellation result4.6, earlier correspondences/cycle constructions and cohomology facts; those foundations and their complete proofs were not reconstructed or read in full. Also read MVW printed p137 Theorem16.25/Remark16.26 for its exact hypothesis distinction. No whole-paper proof-reading or independent acceptance is claimed.
Sources
- Vladimir Voevodsky, Cancellation Theorem, Documenta Mathematica Extra Volume Suslin(2010),671–685 · Corollary4.10 and complete printed proof, p684/PDF14; adjacent Corollary4.9 and its proof; introduction p671/PDF1.