Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External perfect-field Tate cancellation

PDF p. 7: Lemma2.9: smooth-point supported purity

Statement

Let k be perfect. For any K,L∈DM−eff(k), tensoring with Z(1) induces the natural bijection Hom⁡(K,L)→∼Hom⁡(K(1),L(1)). The effective category and integral coefficients are the classical category used by the completed Gysin input. This is valid in every characteristic without a resolution-of-singularities hypothesis.

Source contract

Given: A perfect field and objects of the stated effective motive category.

Goal: Import precisely the full-faithfulness needed for coefficient cancellation.

[F1] Voevodsky2010 Corollary4.10 supplies exactly this natural map and bijection.

External input

Import [F1]. Its deep proof is not locally reconstructed. MVW Theorem16.25's printed proof assumes resolution of singularities, while Remark16.26 explicitly points to the perfect-field theorem; the present import uses the actual published perfect-field result rather than silently discarding the earlier hypothesis.

Depends on

Used by · 2

Dependency tree · 1 level

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.

External dependencies

Vladimir Voevodsky, Cancellation Theorem, Documenta Mathematica Extra Volume Suslin(2010),671–685 · Corollary4.10 and complete printed proof, p684/PDF14; adjacent Corollary4.9 and its proof; introduction p671/PDF1.

For perfect k, tensoring both objects in DM_eff_-(k) by the Tate motive induces a natural bijection on Hom sets.

Hypotheses: Perfect field; arbitrary K,L in the stated effective motive category; integral coefficients in the source. No characteristic-zero or resolution-of-singularities restriction.

Reading limits: Read actual published PDF introduction, full Corollaries4.9/4.10 and their complete displayed proofs. The proof cites the main cancellation result4.6, earlier correspondences/cycle constructions and cohomology facts; those foundations and their complete proofs were not reconstructed or read in full. Also read MVW printed p137 Theorem16.25/Remark16.26 for its exact hypothesis distinction. No whole-paper proof-reading or independent acceptance is claimed.

Sources