Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Exact linear hyperdescent and derived-localization input

PDF p. 6: Proposition 2.6 proof

Statement

For a small Grothendieck site C and a commutative unital ring Λ, the localization of presheaves of unbounded complexes of Λ-modules at maps inducing isomorphisms on all associated cohomology sheaves has as its local objects exactly the objects satisfying descent for every hypercover. Its homotopy category is D(Sh⁡(C,Λ)). Equivalently its reflector is Ri a, represented by evaluating a K-injective sheaf resolution after exact degreewise sheafification. Hypercover descent means that evaluation on an augmented hypercover is the derived product totalization of the cosimplicial evaluation diagram.

External input

Import the stated established hypercover criterion and derived-sheaf model comparison. The source uses homological complexes; reindexing to cochains converts its homology sheaves into cohomology sheaves without changing which maps are local equivalences. The completed general site-derived input supplies K-injective resolutions on the chosen small site.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses in the statement.

Goal: Establish the stated exact map or descent conclusion.

[F1]

The exact theorem and comparison recorded in External input.

Proof

1.1F1

Import Theorem5.7 and Lemma5.10, with Definitions5.1/5.3, for the arbitrary small site and coefficient ring.

2.1F1step 1.1∎

Fact5.15 identifies its localization with the derived category of sheaves. The K-injective reflector has the same local equivalences and target derived sheaves, hence is the same localization by its universal property. This is a precise external model/descent theorem, not a deduction of hyperdescent from ordinary Čech descent.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 1 level

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.

External dependencies

Utsav Choudhury and Martin Gallauer Alves de Souza, Homotopy theory of dg sheaves · §3 p.8 chain conventions; §5.1 Definitions5.1/5.3 pp.17–18; Theorem5.7 pp.18–19; Lemma5.10 p.19; Fact5.15 p.22

For a small Grothendieck site and a commutative unital coefficient ring, localization of presheaves of unbounded complexes at sheafified homology equivalences has exactly hypercover-descent objects as fibrant/local objects and presents the derived category of sheaves. Sheafification induces the stated equivalence of models.

Hypotheses: Arbitrary small site; unbounded complexes; arbitrary commutative unital coefficient ring; fixed universes. No finite dimension or enough-points hypothesis.

Reading limits: Read full definitions and Theorem5.7, Lemma5.10, Theorem5.11 and their displayed proofs pp.17–21, plus Fact5.15 and its preceding model explanation p.22; §3 homological conventions p.8. The previously extracted pages containing these statements/proofs were read; the deeper simplicial-presheaf localization proof cited by the authors is imported. Reindex homological C_n as cohomological C^{-n}; no bound is shifted or assumed.

Sources