How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Asok–Fasel Chern-compatible comparison and lifting input
Statement
Let be algebraically closed of characteristic different from two, and a smooth affine -scheme of finite type of pure dimension three. For the defined and , there exist sets , bijections , , and a surjection with . For every , there are abelian groups and homomorphisms exact at the middle group in , with , such that the nonempty fiber is a surjective image of the underlying set of . Under the ordinary divisor-class identification , the first coordinate is the usual first Chern class ; the second coordinate is the usual Chow-theoretic , with its standard projective-bundle sign convention.
Statement references
External input
This is an explicitly imported established theorem interface, extracted from Asok–Fasel, arXiv:1204.0770v5, Theorem 1 (p. 2), Proposition 6.2 (p. 24), Proposition 6.3 and Proposition 6.5 (p. 25), and the complete proof of Theorem 6.6 (p. 26). It is not a locally reconstructed obstruction-theory theorem. The sets-and-maps formulation records exactly what is needed for the local application; none of the extra symbols is defined by circular appeal to the desired classification.
In the source, is the set of morphisms in the unstable -homotopy category, that is, the category of simplicial Nisnevich sheaves localized at Nisnevich local weak equivalences and at the projections . Here is the simplicial classifying space of the sheaf of invertible two-by-two matrices, and brackets denote unpointed homotopy classes. The map is affine vector-bundle representability. The set is the set of maps to its second Postnikov stage: the truncation preserving homotopy sheaves through degree two and killing the higher ones. The map is induced by that truncation. These constructions and representability are imported, not proved here.
Proposition 6.3 describes the second stage by a line bundle and a degree-two class with coefficients in the -twisted Milnor–Witt K-theory sheaf. Corollary 5.3 identifies that degree-two cohomology with ordinary Milnor K-theory cohomology, hence with by the source's Chow identification. The first two paragraphs of the proof of Theorem 6.6 identify the resulting maps, not merely the groups: the first stage is determinant, and the second coordinate is the composite with the universal second Chern class (using Morel, Remark 7.22). This is the map-level content of .
For precision about the imported uniqueness mechanism, the groups in the statement are the source's Nisnevich cohomology groups Here is the line-bundle coordinate of and its associated multiplicative-group torsor (the complement of its zero section); twisting uses that torsor. Nisnevich cohomology means the derived cohomology of sections on the site of étale maps with covers admitting a residue-field-preserving lift of each point. The symbols , and denote respectively the homotopy sheaf, the kernel sheaf of Theorem 3.3 for , and the Grothendieck–Witt sheaf in the source; their constructions are part of this external input, not additional locally defined suppliers. The exact sequence is displayed in the proof of Theorem 6.6. Proposition 6.2 supplies surjectivity of in dimension three; the preceding lifting discussion, pp. 23–24, supplies the quotient description of a nonempty lift fiber used in the statement. In that description one may choose a representative and a lift; only existence of the resulting surjection of sets is asserted here.
The last paragraph of the proof of Theorem 6.6 establishes . It uses Theorem 3.3, Proposition 6.5, Proposition 5.1 to kill the relevant fundamental-ideal sheaf, Proposition 5.4 with modulus twelve to kill the top Milnor-K quotient cohomology, and Proposition 4.16 to make the twisted Grothendieck–Witt group a quotient of . Divisibility of zero-cycles on this smooth affine threefold makes this last quotient zero. Thus the imported input includes all hypotheses needed for both existence and uniqueness, for every determinant class, not merely the trivial determinant.
Source notes
Read Theorem 1 and introductory outline, pp. 2–3; §6, pp. 22–26, including Theorem 6.1, Proposition 6.2 and its proof, Proposition 6.3 and its proof, Proposition 6.5 and the complete proof of Theorem 6.6. Also read Theorem 3.3 statement (p. 10), Proposition 4.16 statement (p. 17), and Proposition 5.1, Corollary 5.3 and Proposition 5.4 with the adjacent displayed arguments (pp. 20–21). Visually inspected PDF p. 26. Did not reconstruct §§2–5, Morel Remark 7.22, the cited representability theorem, Bloch identification, or the zero-cycle divisibility theorem; these remain part of the explicit published external input, not locally proved results.
Depends on
Used by · 1
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
The comparison/lifting interface in the Statement, extracted from the proof of Theorem 6.6; Theorem 1 gives its resulting pointed bijection.
Hypotheses: k algebraically closed, characteristic not 2; X a smooth affine k-scheme of finite type of pure dimension 3; ordinary Chow-theoretic Chern classes; line bundles arbitrary.
Reading limits: Read Theorem 1 and introductory outline, pp. 2–3; §6, pp. 22–26, including Theorem 6.1, Proposition 6.2 and its proof, Proposition 6.3 and its proof, Proposition 6.5 and the complete proof of Theorem 6.6. Also read Theorem 3.3 statement (p. 10), Proposition 4.16 statement (p. 17), and Proposition 5.1, Corollary 5.3 and Proposition 5.4 with the adjacent displayed arguments (pp. 20–21). Visually inspected PDF p. 26. Did not reconstruct §§2–5, Morel Remark 7.22, the cited representability theorem, Bloch identification, or the zero-cycle divisibility theorem; these remain part of the explicit published external input, not locally proved results.
Sources
- Aravind Asok and Jean Fasel, A cohomological classification of vector bundles on smooth affine threefolds · Theorem 1, p. 2; §6, pp. 22–26