How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Krishna's affine zero-cycle divisibility and kernel input
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice and the fixed universe bounds of the affine perfect comparison. Let be algebraically closed and let be a reduced, pure-dimensional affine -scheme of finite type and dimension . For the Levine–Weibel zero-cycle group and actual residue-class cycle map imported from Krishna’s Section 2.1 and transported to perfect by the affine comparison, multiplication by every positive integer is bijective on , and every element of is killed by .
External input
This is the instance of Krishna's Theorems 1.3 and 1.4. Section 2.1 defines the source group using closed smooth points on top-dimensional components and its cycle map by their residue-sheaf classes. For this reduced pure-dimensional affine , its displayed source definition is the presentation of Levine–Weibel zero cycles. Apply Affine perfect K zero and bundle K zero to its commutative coordinate algebra: the isomorphism to the actual perfect sends the source residue Euler class to the same perfect residue-sheaf class, so it preserves the kernel and the stated annihilation bound. Krishna’s own §2.1, equation (2.2), supplies the quotient map for this reduced scope; no extension from the separate normal-only import is inferred. The cited theorems are imported established inputs; no local reconstruction of their proofs is asserted.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For reduced affine algebras of dimension d at least 2 over an algebraically closed field, CH^d is uniquely divisible; for d at least 1 the kernel of its cycle map to K0 has exponent dividing (d−1)!. Section 2.1 also supplies the quotient cycle map for reduced quasi-projective schemes, sending each permitted regular closed point to its residue-sheaf class.
Hypotheses: Reduced finite-type affine algebra over an algebraically closed field; the displayed dimensional bounds and the source's top-dimensional regular-point convention. The map in Section 2.1 assumes a reduced quasi-projective scheme of dimension d at least 1 over a perfect field and a forbidden closed subset containing X_sing but no d-dimensional component. Here use d=3 and Y=X_sing.
Reading limits: Read the v3 theorem statements on p. 2 and the Section 2.1 definitions, equations (2.1)–(2.2), and following K-theory convention on pp. 6–8 in extracted PDF text and versioned HTML. The deep theorem proofs and the recalled Levine–Weibel Proposition 2.1 were not reconstructed or validated. PDF screenshots were unavailable.
Sources
- Amalendu Krishna, Murthy’s conjecture on 0-cycles, arXiv:1511.04221v3 (18 March 2019) · Theorems 1.3 and 1.4, printed/PDF p. 2; §2.1, pp. 6–8, quotient (2.1), cycle map (2.2), and the following K-theory convention