How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External EM affine syntomic filtration and actual obstruction map
PDF p. 5: Proposition 2.6: torsion freeness
Statement
For every -algebra and , the complex has a finite filtration from zero to itself, with graded pieces, in order, where . The cotangent complex and its derived exterior powers are cohomologically nonpositive (compute by a simplicial polynomial resolution). For any qcqs -scheme the canonical comparison fits in the actual natural fiber sequence Here is the cokernel of the Artin–Schreier map on differential forms (EM Definition 4.29), and its cdh sheafification is meant. The second arrow is EM (4.7), not an arbitrary map selected from a group isomorphism.
External input
Import EM Lemma 4.16 and Corollary 4.32 with their stated hypotheses. The finite filtration is proved there by the de Rham/Cartier filtration and left Kan extension; the fiber sequence is proved from the actual motivic pullback square. These are established inputs, not locally reconstructed foundations. In particular, the obstruction formula is the correct primary comparison used to interpret the positive-characteristic part of the next external input. No equivalence between derived syntomic cohomology and ordinary étale logarithmic forms on an arbitrary singular affine is asserted.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
Mod-p syntomic cohomology is the left Kan extension from finite polynomial F_p-algebras of RΓ_et(−,Ω_log^j)[−j]. It has a finite filtration with the graded pieces stated below. For qcqs X there is a natural fiber sequence mot/p → syn/p → RΓ_cdh(X,νtilde_1(j))[−j−1].
Hypotheses: All F_p-algebras for Definition 4.14/Lemma 4.16; all qcqs F_p-schemes for Corollary 4.32; j>=0 (use r=1).
Reading limits: Read full Definition 4.14, Lemma 4.16 and its proof, Remarks 4.30/4.31, Corollary 4.32 and its proof; did not reconstruct underlying de Rham-Witt, TC or rigidity theorems. Use v1 bytes, not v2 numbering.
Sources
- Elden Elmanto and Matthew Morrow, Motivic cohomology of equicharacteristic schemes · Definition 4.14, Lemma 4.16 and proof, pp.24–25; Remark 4.30(2), Remark 4.31, Corollary 4.32 and proof, p.30