How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External qcqs classical perfect generator
PDF p. 3: Nonconnective algebraic K theory: enhanced prerequisite interface
Statement
Assume AC and let X be a quasi-compact quasi-separated scheme. In the ordinary perfect subcategory of D() there is a perfect object P such that every perfect object is obtained from P by finitely iterating integer shifts, finite sums, cones and direct summands. This is the classical generator statement of Stacks Remark 36.17.2; its proof combines the perfect generator of with compact=perfect and the compact-generation proposition.
Source contract
Given: qcqs X and AC; perfection is the supplied sheaf-derived local condition Perfect complexes on schemes and their support.
Goal: Import one substantial scheme theorem needed only to enumerate perfect objects.
[F1] Stacks Remark 36.17.2, Proposition 36.17.1, Theorem 36.15.3 and Proposition 13.37.6 give the stated classical generator.
External input
Import [F1]. The proof is not reconstructed. Its use below establishes essential smallness through finite constructions and small Hom sets; it supplies no coherent product, enhanced equivalence, or scheme localization theorem.
Depends on
Dependency tree · 3 levels
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text. The view shows up to three dependency steps; open a prerequisite to continue.
External dependencies
For a qcqs scheme X there is a perfect complex P that is a classical generator of D_perf(O_X): every perfect complex lies in its closure under finite sums, shifts, cones and direct summands.
Hypotheses: X quasi-compact and quasi-separated. This is a statement about the ordinary derived category of O_X-module sheaves with quasi-coherent cohomology.
Reading limits: Read Remark 36.17.2 and full statements/proofs of Proposition 36.17.1, Theorem 36.15.3 and Proposition 13.37.6. Theorem 36.15.3 itself says a small detail is omitted; its affine-gluing, compact-generation and Koszul prerequisites are imported, not reconstructed. This is used only for object smallness, never to infer a coherent enhancement or monoidal equivalence.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Derived Categories of Schemes, Compact and perfect objects · Remark 36.17.2; Proposition 36.17.1; Theorem 36.15.3 (09IS), together with Proposition 13.37.6 (09SR)