How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
External straightening and symmetric monoidal criteria
PDF p. 3: Strong monoidal transports from the common product-base family
Statement
For any infinity-category , straightening gives an equivalence , where has cocartesian fibrations as objects and functors over preserving cocartesian arrows as morphisms. Functor categories satisfy exponential currying .
For , a cocartesian fibration is a symmetric monoidal infinity-category exactly when its inert maps give for every , with terminal. Maps over preserving all cocartesian arrows are strong symmetric monoidal functors, including equivalence of their tensor and unit comparisons.
Let satisfy all four conditions of Hinich Definition 2.1.1, with saturated markings, and let classify its marked fibers. The composite sends to equivalences and extends to . The localized family is the unstraightening of . Its pullback to is classified by and has the localized fibers. These are constructions of whole cocartesian families and their localization map. If consists of equivalences, , giving the original-base special case. The explicit marked-cocartesian hypotheses and, in the monoidal application, preservation of componentwise markings by active tensor transports remain required.
Source contract
Given: Categories in fixed suitable universes, genuinely cocartesian families, and the stated Segal and marking conditions where used.
Goal: Import the standard family/functor dictionary and exact strong monoidal criterion.
[F1] Hinich §2.1.5, equation (31), supplies Coc(D)≃Fun(D,Cat∞) with cocartesian-preserving maps. Its §2.2.2–2.2.6 proves the actual family-localization assertion.
[F2] HTT Notation 1.2.7.2 and Proposition 1.2.7.3 supply functor infinity-categories; currying is their defining simplicial exponential identity.
[F3] HA Definition 2.0.0.7 and Definition 2.1.3.7 supply precisely the Segal and strong symmetric monoidal conditions, including the nullary unit.
External input
Import [F1]–[F3] with the frontmatter reading limits. This standard formal input does not supply a product-base family in an application: that must actually have been constructed, with its hypotheses verified. No identification of separately existing functors is part of this import.
Depends on
- Vladimir Hinich, Dwyer–Kan localization revisited · §2.1.5, equivalence (31); Lemma 2.1.6; Proposition 2.1.4 and proof §2.2.2–2.2.6; Definition 3.2.1 and Proposition 3.2.2
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Definition 2.0.0.7; Remark 2.1.2.19–20; Definition 2.1.3.7 and its preceding discussion
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Topos Theory · Notation 1.2.7.2 and Proposition 1.2.7.3; see Hinich §2.1.5 for straightening
Dependency tree · 1 level
Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.
External dependencies
Coc(D), whose maps preserve cocartesian arrows, is equivalent to Fun(D,Cat∞). A marked cocartesian family localizes over L(D,W), classified by the extension of L∘F⁺ to that base. Its pullback to D is classified by L∘F⁺, with localized fibers. Under active-tensor preservation of markings, localization over Fin_* is symmetric monoidal.
Hypotheses: For family localization the four conditions of Definition 2.1.1 are required, with saturated markings. For the monoidal assertion every active Fin_* transport must preserve the componentwise marking. Cocartesian fibrations may be presented up to equivalence in Cat∞ as explicitly explained in Definition 2.1.3.
Reading limits: Current adjudication read Definition 2.1.1, Proposition 2.1.4, §2.1.5–2.1.6 and §2.2.2–2.2.5, and Definition 3.2.1/Proposition 3.2.2. Equation (33) and the immediately following pullback description fix the changed assertion. Earlier authoring reported broader reading; no new reconstruction of the straightening model structures or all of §2.2.6 is claimed.
A cocartesian fibration over N(Fin_*) is symmetric monoidal when its inert Segal maps identify the nth fiber with the nth power of the first, including the terminal zeroth fiber. A functor over N(Fin_*) preserving all cocartesian edges is symmetric monoidal; its tensor and unit comparison maps are equivalences.
Hypotheses: Cocartesian fibrations of infinity-categories over N(Fin_*), Segal condition for every n≥0, and functors preserving all cocartesian edges, not merely the inert ones.
Reading limits: Read the complete stated definitions, surrounding discussion of tensor/unit comparisons and Remarks 2.1.2.19–20. No reconstruction of the general infinity-operad foundations is claimed.
The simplicial exponential Fun(S,C) is the functor infinity-category when C is an infinity-category. Exponential currying gives Fun(B×S,C)≅Fun(B,Fun(S,C)).
Hypotheses: S,B simplicial sets and C an infinity-category, in compatible universes. The currying identity is the ordinary exponential identity of simplicial sets.
Reading limits: Read the notation and displayed functor-category statement. The currying identity follows directly from the definition (Fun(S,C))_n=Hom(S×Δⁿ,C), not from a separate comparison theorem.
Sources
- Vladimir Hinich, Dwyer–Kan localization revisited · §2.1.5, equivalence (31); Lemma 2.1.6; Proposition 2.1.4 and proof §2.2.2–2.2.6; Definition 3.2.1 and Proposition 3.2.2
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Definition 2.0.0.7; Remark 2.1.2.19–20; Definition 2.1.3.7 and its preceding discussion
- Jacob Lurie, Higher Topos Theory · Notation 1.2.7.2 and Proposition 1.2.7.3; see Hinich §2.1.5 for straightening