Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourced
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

External straightening and symmetric monoidal criteria

PDF p. 3: Strong monoidal transports from the common product-base family

Statement

For any infinity-category D, straightening gives an equivalence Coc(D)≃Fun(D,Cat∞), where Coc(D) has cocartesian fibrations as objects and functors over D preserving cocartesian arrows as morphisms. Functor categories satisfy exponential currying Fun(B×S,Cat∞)≃Fun(B,Fun(S,Cat∞)).

For S=N(Fin∗), a cocartesian fibration C⊗→S is a symmetric monoidal infinity-category exactly when its inert maps ρi:⟨n⟩→⟨1⟩ give Cn≃C1n for every n≥0, with C0 terminal. Maps over S preserving all cocartesian arrows are strong symmetric monoidal functors, including equivalence of their tensor and unit comparisons.

Let f:(C,V)→(D,W) satisfy all four conditions of Hinich Definition 2.1.1, with saturated markings, and let F+:D→Cat∞+ classify its marked fibers. The composite L∘F+:D→Cat∞ sends W to equivalences and extends to F‾:L(D,W)→Cat∞. The localized family L(C,V)→L(D,W) is the unstraightening of F‾. Its pullback to D is classified by L∘F+ and has the localized fibers. These are constructions of whole cocartesian families and their localization map. If W consists of equivalences, L(D,W)≃D, giving the original-base special case. The explicit marked-cocartesian hypotheses and, in the monoidal application, preservation of componentwise markings by active tensor transports remain required.

Source contract

Given: Categories in fixed suitable universes, genuinely cocartesian families, and the stated Segal and marking conditions where used.

Goal: Import the standard family/functor dictionary and exact strong monoidal criterion.

[F1] Hinich §2.1.5, equation (31), supplies Coc(D)≃Fun(D,Cat∞) with cocartesian-preserving maps. Its §2.2.2–2.2.6 proves the actual family-localization assertion.

[F2] HTT Notation 1.2.7.2 and Proposition 1.2.7.3 supply functor infinity-categories; currying is their defining simplicial exponential identity.

[F3] HA Definition 2.0.0.7 and Definition 2.1.3.7 supply precisely the Segal and strong symmetric monoidal conditions, including the nullary unit.

External input

Import [F1]–[F3] with the frontmatter reading limits. This standard formal input does not supply a product-base family in an application: that must actually have been constructed, with its hypotheses verified. No identification of separately existing functors is part of this import.

Depends on

Used by · 1

Dependency tree · 1 level

Arrows run from prerequisites to the items that use them. External source nodes link directly to the cited text.

External dependencies

Vladimir Hinich, Dwyer–Kan localization revisited · §2.1.5, equivalence (31); Lemma 2.1.6; Proposition 2.1.4 and proof §2.2.2–2.2.6; Definition 3.2.1 and Proposition 3.2.2

Coc(D), whose maps preserve cocartesian arrows, is equivalent to Fun(D,Cat∞). A marked cocartesian family localizes over L(D,W), classified by the extension of L∘F⁺ to that base. Its pullback to D is classified by L∘F⁺, with localized fibers. Under active-tensor preservation of markings, localization over Fin_* is symmetric monoidal.

Hypotheses: For family localization the four conditions of Definition 2.1.1 are required, with saturated markings. For the monoidal assertion every active Fin_* transport must preserve the componentwise marking. Cocartesian fibrations may be presented up to equivalence in Cat∞ as explicitly explained in Definition 2.1.3.

Reading limits: Current adjudication read Definition 2.1.1, Proposition 2.1.4, §2.1.5–2.1.6 and §2.2.2–2.2.5, and Definition 3.2.1/Proposition 3.2.2. Equation (33) and the immediately following pullback description fix the changed assertion. Earlier authoring reported broader reading; no new reconstruction of the straightening model structures or all of §2.2.6 is claimed.

Jacob Lurie, Higher Algebra · Definition 2.0.0.7; Remark 2.1.2.19–20; Definition 2.1.3.7 and its preceding discussion

A cocartesian fibration over N(Fin_*) is symmetric monoidal when its inert Segal maps identify the nth fiber with the nth power of the first, including the terminal zeroth fiber. A functor over N(Fin_*) preserving all cocartesian edges is symmetric monoidal; its tensor and unit comparison maps are equivalences.

Hypotheses: Cocartesian fibrations of infinity-categories over N(Fin_*), Segal condition for every n≥0, and functors preserving all cocartesian edges, not merely the inert ones.

Reading limits: Read the complete stated definitions, surrounding discussion of tensor/unit comparisons and Remarks 2.1.2.19–20. No reconstruction of the general infinity-operad foundations is claimed.

Jacob Lurie, Higher Topos Theory · Notation 1.2.7.2 and Proposition 1.2.7.3; see Hinich §2.1.5 for straightening

The simplicial exponential Fun(S,C) is the functor infinity-category when C is an infinity-category. Exponential currying gives Fun(B×S,C)≅Fun(B,Fun(S,C)).

Hypotheses: S,B simplicial sets and C an infinity-category, in compatible universes. The currying identity is the ordinary exponential identity of simplicial sets.

Reading limits: Read the notation and displayed functor-category statement. The currying identity follows directly from the definition (Fun(S,C))_n=Hom(S×Δⁿ,C), not from a separate comparison theorem.

Sources