Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Skolem construction and design prerequisites

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The three explicit block families give a Steiner triple system of every order 6m+1 for m≥1. The proof checks each pair exactly once using a half-idempotent quasigroup. Existing design definitions are placed here as prerequisite context; the theorem remains draft.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26Open item page →

A 2-(v,k,λ) design

Definition

Let v,k,λ be natural numbers with 2≤k<v and λ≥1. A 2-(v,k,λ) design is a pair (P,B) such that:

  • P is a finite set with ∣P∣=v;
  • B is a finite collection of distinct k-element subsets of P, called the blocks;
  • every subset of P with cardinality 2 lies in exactly λ blocks.

Remarks

The number of blocks and the number of blocks through a point are not part of the definition. They are derived immediately below.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26Open item page →

Steiner triple systems

Definition

A Steiner triple system of order v, written STS(v), is a 2-(v,3,1) design.

Remarks

This is the case conventionally denoted S(2,3,v) in the general Steiner-system notation. The present page uses only this triple-system case.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Skolem's construction gives a Steiner triple system of order 6m+1

Statement

For every integer m≥1, the following explicit construction gives a Steiner triple system of order 6m+1. Let Q={0,…,2m−1}, interpreting its addition modulo 2m, and let I=Z/3. Define a permutation π:Q→Q by π(2a)=a and π(2a+1)=m+a for 0≤a<m, and define x∘y=π((x+y) mod 2m). On the point set (Q×I)∪{∞}, take the following three families of blocks, with layer arithmetic in I:

  • {(a,0),(a,1),(a,2)} for 0≤a<m;
  • {∞,(m+a,i),(a,i+1)} for 0≤a<m and i∈I;
  • {(x,i),(y,i),(x∘y,i+1)} for each two-element subset {x,y}⊆Q and i∈I.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer m≥1, the point set and block families in the Statement.

[F2]

A collection of three-element blocks on v>3 points, in which every pair of distinct points occurs in exactly one block, is a Steiner triple system (A 2-(v,k,λ) design, Steiner triple systems).

Proof technique: direct.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

The even and odd representatives are mapped bijectively by π to A={0,…,m−1} and B={m,…,2m−1} respectively. Thus π is a permutation. By [F1], for each x∈Q the map z↦x∘z is a bijection. The operation is commutative, and its diagonal is a∘a=a and (m+a)∘(m+a)=a for 0≤a<m, since the corresponding sums modulo 2m are both 2a. Denote these diagonal values by d(x)=x∘x.

1.2givenalgebra

Each listed block has three distinct points. For the third family, x≠y makes the two layer-i points distinct, while the last point has layer i+1≠i. The first and second families plainly have three distinct points. Blocks of the three families cannot coincide: infinity distinguishes the second, and a first-family block uses three layers, while a third-family block uses exactly two. In the third family the layer containing two points uniquely determines i and then {x,y}, so its indexing produces no duplicate blocks.

1.3givenalgebra

A pair containing ∞ occurs only in a second-family block. If its other point is (m+a,i), its unique block is {∞,(m+a,i),(a,i+1)}; if its other point is (a,j) with a∈A, its unique block is {∞,(m+a,j−1),(a,j)}. The two cases partition all finite points and their indices are unique.

1.4givenalgebra

A pair of distinct finite points in the same layer, (x,i),(y,i), has x≠y and occurs in the unique third-family block indexed by {x,y},i. Neither of the other families has two finite points in the same layer, and the repeated layer in a third-family block is uniquely determined.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

For a finite pair in different layers, there is a unique orientation ((x,i),(y,i+1)), because the layer set has three elements. A third-family block containing this pair must have repeated layer i: a block repeated at i+1 uses layers i+1,i+2, and one repeated at i+2 uses layers i+2,i. Such a block therefore has the form {(x,i),(z,i),(y,i+1)}, where z≠x and x∘z=y. Step 1.1 gives a unique solution z. It satisfies z=x exactly when y=d(x), so the pair occurs in exactly one third-family block when y≠d(x), and in none when y=d(x).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1givenalgebra

If y=d(x) and x∈A, then y=x and the pair lies in the unique first-family block for x. If y=d(x) and x=m+a∈B, then y=a and the pair lies in the unique second-family block indexed by a,i. Conversely, the different-layer finite pairs of every first-family block have the oriented form (a,i),(a,i+1), and the unique finite pair in every second-family block has the oriented form (m+a,i),(a,i+1); these are precisely the two diagonal cases just described. Thus neither family duplicates the third-family pairs from step 2.1, and the diagonal pairs each occur once.

4.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1step 3.1F1F2algebra∎

Steps 1.3, 1.4, 2.1 and 3.1 exhaust every pair of distinct points and prove unique block coverage. The point set has 3(2m)+1=6m+1 points by [F1], and 6m+1≥7>3. Step 1.2 and [F2] now establish the claimed Steiner triple system.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources