Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 4 also cleared it.

Lacunary Fourier Series and Sidon Sets — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples test the ratio condition, make a finite Riesz product explicit, and show that the full integer dual is far too large to be Sidon.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The powers of two form a Hadamard-lacunary sequence

Example

The sequence λj=2j for j≥1 is Hadamard-lacunary with ratio q=2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The sequence λj=2j.

Verification

technique · direct ratio calculation
1.1givenalgebra

For every j≥1, λj+1=2j+1=2λj.

2.1step 1.1∎

Thus λj+1≥2λj with one fixed ratio 2>1, exactly [step 1.1] as required by Hadamard-lacunary sequences and lacunary trigonometric series.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

Gaps tending to infinity need not be Hadamard-lacunary

Statement refuted

“If an increasing integer sequence has gaps tending to infinity, then it is Hadamard-lacunary.”

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The increasing sequence λj=j2 for j≥1.

Counterexample

technique · direct gap and ratio calculation
1.1givenalgebra

Its successive gaps are [given, algebra] λj+1−λj=(j+1)2−j2=2j+1⟶∞.

2.1step 1.1algebra∎

But [step 1.1, algebra] λj+1λj=(1+1j)2⟶1. Hence no fixed q>1 can satisfy the ratio condition eventually, much less at every index. This violates the definition in Hadamard-lacunary sequences and lacunary trigonometric series.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

A Riesz product for three powers of three

Example

For unimodular ε1,ε3,ε9, the product

P(x)=∏n∈{1,3,9}(1+Re⁡(εnen(x)))

is a nonnegative mass-one trigonometric polynomial, with P^(−n)=εn‾/2 for n=1,3,9.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Three complex numbers ε1,ε3,ε9 of modulus one.

Verification

technique · expand the three ratio-three factors
1.1givenalgebra

Each factor equals ∣1+εnen∣2/2, so P≥0. In an [given, algebra] expansion, each chosen frequency is a signed sum of 1,3,9 with coefficients in {−1,0,1}.

2.1step 1.1algebra

Such a signed sum is zero only when all three coefficients are zero: [step 1.1, algebra] the largest nonzero term has magnitude larger than the sum of all smaller ones. Thus the constant coefficient is 1, so ∫01P=1.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

The same observation shows that frequency −n has only the first-order [step 2.1, algebra] contribution εn‾e−n/2. Therefore P^(−n)=εn‾/2, agreeing with Riesz-product witnesses for a Hadamard-lacunary set.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07Open item page →

The integers are not a Sidon set

Statement refuted

“The set Z is a Sidon set.”

Facts & Assumptions

Given: z=e1(x), and polynomials P0=Q0=1 defined recursively by Pm+1=Pm+z2mQm,Qm+1=Pm−z2mQm.

Counterexample

technique · Rudin--Shapiro recursion
1.1givenalgebra

Inductively, Pm and Qm have 2m coefficients, all ±1, on [given, algebra] the frequencies 0,…,2m−1. The two supports in each recursion are disjoint, so this is immediate from the displayed construction.

2.1step 1.1algebra

On ∣z∣=1, the parallelogram identity gives [step 1.1, algebra] ∣Pm+1∣2+∣Qm+1∣2=2∣Pm∣2+2∣Qm∣2. Starting from ∣P0∣2+∣Q0∣2=2, induction yields ∣Pm∣2+∣Qm∣2=2m+1, hence ∥Pm∥∞≤2(m+1)/2.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

The coefficient ℓ1 mass of Pm is 2m. If the defining [step 2.1, algebra] inequality of Sidon sets in the integer dual held for Z with one constant C, it would give 2m≤C2(m+1)/2 for every m, which is impossible. Hence Z is not Sidon.

Sources