How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lacunary Fourier Series and Sidon Sets — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
2 · Summary
These examples test the ratio condition, make a finite Riesz product explicit, and show that the full integer dual is far too large to be Sidon.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The powers of two form a Hadamard-lacunary sequence
Example
The sequence for is Hadamard-lacunary with ratio .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sequence .
Verification
For every , .
Thus with one fixed ratio , exactly [step 1.1] as required by Hadamard-lacunary sequences and lacunary trigonometric series.
Gaps tending to infinity need not be Hadamard-lacunary
Statement refuted
“If an increasing integer sequence has gaps tending to infinity, then it is Hadamard-lacunary.”
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The increasing sequence for .
Counterexample
Its successive gaps are [given, algebra]
But [step 1.1, algebra] Hence no fixed can satisfy the ratio condition eventually, much less at every index. This violates the definition in Hadamard-lacunary sequences and lacunary trigonometric series.
A Riesz product for three powers of three
Example
For unimodular , the product
is a nonnegative mass-one trigonometric polynomial, with for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Three complex numbers of modulus one.
Verification
Each factor equals , so . In an [given, algebra] expansion, each chosen frequency is a signed sum of with coefficients in .
Such a signed sum is zero only when all three coefficients are zero: [step 1.1, algebra] the largest nonzero term has magnitude larger than the sum of all smaller ones. Thus the constant coefficient is , so .
The same observation shows that frequency has only the first-order [step 2.1, algebra] contribution . Therefore , agreeing with Riesz-product witnesses for a Hadamard-lacunary set.
The integers are not a Sidon set
Statement refuted
“The set is a Sidon set.”
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , and polynomials defined recursively by
Counterexample
Inductively, and have coefficients, all , on [given, algebra] the frequencies . The two supports in each recursion are disjoint, so this is immediate from the displayed construction.
On , the parallelogram identity gives [step 1.1, algebra] Starting from , induction yields , hence .
The coefficient mass of is . If the defining [step 2.1, algebra] inequality of Sidon sets in the integer dual held for with one constant , it would give for every , which is impossible. Hence is not Sidon.
Sources
- Gilles Pisier, Sidon Sets in Uniformly Bounded Orthonormal Systems, More Examples
- Aihua Fan, Hervé Queffélec, and Martine Queffélec, The Furstenberg Set and Its Random Version
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed., Definition 3.6.5
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, 3rd ed., Example 3.6.11