How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projected Euler with certified inexact projection solves
Definition
Input a nonempty compact, closed, and convex set , , an exact force evaluator , , integer step count , initial state , tolerances , finite budgets for , and a projection-certificate provider . The explicit closedness condition matches Projected contact dynamics and explicit projection Euler step. An admissible provider, queried with , must return after at most candidate checks, in either case: unresolved or certified(p,\Pi) with a finite exact certificate proving and
Set , , and start with the given . For , form and call . If the response is unresolved or is not a sound certified(p,\Pi) response of the stated form, stop and return unresolved with the valid prefix . Otherwise set and continue. After all calls succeed, return complete, the nodes, their affine interpolant, and the per-step tolerances. The procedure assumes exact force evaluations and sound exact certificates; arithmetic and force-evaluation errors are not included. For exact projection-Euler requests, set every and require the same residual certificate of A certified projection variational residual bounds the projection error.
Allow at most provider calls, and enforce each call's stated finite candidate-check budget. Failure to certify a projection is reported; no convergence or accuracy is inferred from an unverified stopping tolerance. The provider is an explicit input: this definition does not construct a solver for arbitrary compact convex sets.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David E. Stewart, Dynamics with Inequalities: Impacts and Hard Constraints (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dimitri P. Bertsekas, 6.253 Convex Analysis and Optimization, Complete Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)