How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-budget multiplicative update for approximate D-optimal design
Definition
Let , let be a finite nonempty candidate set, and let be the feature vector for each . An approximate design and information matrix use the convention of Approximate designs and linear-model optimality criteria. The same vectors may be scalar-observation sensitivities at a fixed parameter, as in Finite nonlinear observation designs, local identifiability, and weighted information, with a scalar precision absorbed into . The procedure uses exact arithmetic.
Input: A finite nonempty , , its feature vectors , an approximate initial design , and a finite nonnegative integer budget counting weight updates.
Procedure: Form . If is not positive definite, return . Otherwise, for , with current and , compute If , return . If , return . Otherwise set form , and continue.
Remarks
Finite-budget multiplicative design updates preserve the simplex and nonsingularity ↗ proves preservation of positive definiteness and the bounds of at most updates and sensitivity scans. A nonzero returned violation is reported as-is; it is not an exact D-optimality certificate. The exact integer allocation problem remains separate from this approximate-weight procedure.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Holger Dette, Andrey Pepelyshev, and Anatoly Zhigljavsky, Improving Updating Rules in Multiplicative Algorithms for Computing D-optimal Designs, §§1–2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, §§7.5.1–7.5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)