Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Approximate designs and linear-model optimality criteria

Definition

Let X be a finite nonempty candidate set, let p≥1, and let f:X→Rp be the declared regression-vector map. Work under the stated linear mean model Y=f(x)Tβ+ϵ, with mean-zero independent run errors of common variance σ2>0. These are modeling assumptions, not claims about an experiment's empirical adequacy.

An approximate design is a weight function ξ:X→[0,1] with ∑x∈Xξx=1. Its support is supp⁡(ξ)={x:ξx>0} and its information matrix is M(ξ)=∑x∈Xξxf(x)f(x)T. This matrix is symmetric and positive semidefinite. A design is nonsingular when M(ξ) is positive definite. For a singular design, the page's estimability convention is that a specified coefficient contrast cTβ is estimable exactly when c∈span⁡{f(x):x∈supp⁡(ξ)}; the inverse-matrix criteria below are defined only for nonsingular designs.

For nonsingular designs on this fixed f and X, D-optimality maximizes log⁡det⁡M(ξ), A-optimality minimizes tr⁡(M(ξ)−1), E-optimality maximizes λmin⁡(M(ξ)), and c-optimality for a fixed c∈Rp minimizes cTM(ξ)−1c; c=0 gives a trivial tie. The smallest eigenvalue is real because M(ξ) is real symmetric (Real spectral theorem: a self-adjoint endomorphism of a finite-dimensional real inner product space has an orthonormal eigenbasis). These are different model- and candidate-dependent objectives; none is a universal design ranking.

An exact n-run design, for an integer n≥1, has weights ξx=nx/n with nonnegative integer counts nx summing to n; optimizing over those integer allocations is a separate finite problem.

Remarks

The equivalence criterion for D-optimality is proved in Equivalence criterion for D-optimal approximate designs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources