How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite Markov closed-class graph decomposition
Definition
Graph convention. For any finite real column-stochastic matrix on , the positive-transition graph has a directed edge exactly when . This defines the communicating classes and closed classes for real matrices, whether or not their entries can be computed exactly.
Algorithm input. An exact finite real matrix with indexed state set and , represented in an exact arithmetic model that terminates on the required comparisons with zero. If an entry is negative or any column sum differs from one, return invalid-input. Rational entries provide an effective instance of this exact-comparison interface. A rounded input without certified sign and column-sum decisions is outside this procedure's input contract.
Output. A partition of into the strongly connected components of the directed graph of positive transitions, the list of closed communicating classes, and the remaining transient states.
Procedure. Form the usual row-transition matrix . Initialize a Boolean relation to true exactly when or . For , and then for every , replace by . Place in the same component exactly when both and are true. Mark a component closed exactly when for every and . Return the closed components, the nonclosed components, and their state labels in increasing order. The procedure uses finitely many exact comparisons and Boolean updates; no sparse storage format or cost bound is asserted. It is a graph computation under the exact-comparison interface, not a claim that positivity of arbitrary unrepresented real numbers can be decided from rounded approximations.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles M. Grinstead and J. Laurie Snell, Introduction to Probability, Chapter 11 (standard reference, not scraped)