Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Markov closed-class graph decomposition

Definition

Graph convention. For any finite real column-stochastic matrix P on S={1,…,n}, the positive-transition graph has a directed edge j→i exactly when Pij>0. This defines the communicating classes and closed classes for real matrices, whether or not their entries can be computed exactly.

Algorithm input. An exact finite real matrix P∈Rn×n with indexed state set S={1,…,n} and n≥1, represented in an exact arithmetic model that terminates on the required comparisons with zero. If an entry is negative or any column sum differs from one, return invalid-input. Rational entries provide an effective instance of this exact-comparison interface. A rounded input without certified sign and column-sum decisions is outside this procedure's input contract.

Output. A partition of S into the strongly connected components of the directed graph of positive transitions, the list of closed communicating classes, and the remaining transient states.

Procedure. Form the usual row-transition matrix K=PT. Initialize a Boolean relation Rij to true exactly when i=j or Kij>0. For k=1,…,n, and then for every i,j, replace Rij by Rij∨(Rik∧Rkj). Place i,j in the same component exactly when both Rij and Rji are true. Mark a component C closed exactly when Kij=0 for every i∈C and j∉C. Return the closed components, the nonclosed components, and their state labels in increasing order. The procedure uses finitely many exact comparisons and Boolean updates; no sparse storage format or cost bound is asserted. It is a graph computation under the exact-comparison interface, not a claim that positivity of arbitrary unrepresented real numbers can be decided from rounded approximations.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources