Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-pool version-space query procedure

Definition

Input a finite pool-based realizable active-learning instance with ordered pool U=(u1,…,um) and a nonnegative integer query budget b. Initialize the current version space V=H, query count q=0, pool index i=1, an empty query log, and an empty status record for each pool index. While i≤m, first check whether every h∈V gives the same label at ui. If so, record that unanimous label as a prediction and set i←i+1, even when q=b. Otherwise, if q=b, mark indices i,i+1,…,m as abstentions and return the current V, records, and query log. If instead q<b, query y=O(ui), append (i,y) to the query log, record the queried label, replace V by {h∈V:h(ui)=y}, set q←q+1 and i←i+1, and, if now q=b, mark all remaining indices i,…,m as abstentions and return. If the scan reaches i=m+1, return the current V, records, and query log. The query budget limits oracle calls; the procedure scans each pool index at most once and reports unresolved suffix entries as abstentions when it stops at the budget.

Definition references

Finite pool-based realizable active-learning instance: fixes the measurable binary classifier class, finite ordered pool, pointwise exact target oracle, version spaces, and disagreement region used by this procedure.

Steve Hanneke, Theory of Active Learning, version 1.1, §5.1

Daniel Joseph Hsu, Algorithms for Active Learning, Chapter 2 §§2.1–2.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources