How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-pool version-space query procedure
Definition
Input a finite pool-based realizable active-learning instance with ordered pool and a nonnegative integer query budget . Initialize the current version space , query count , pool index , an empty query log, and an empty status record for each pool index. While , first check whether every gives the same label at . If so, record that unanimous label as a prediction and set , even when . Otherwise, if , mark indices as abstentions and return the current , records, and query log. If instead , query , append to the query log, record the queried label, replace by , set and , and, if now , mark all remaining indices as abstentions and return. If the scan reaches , return the current , records, and query log. The query budget limits oracle calls; the procedure scans each pool index at most once and reports unresolved suffix entries as abstentions when it stops at the budget.
Definition references
Finite pool-based realizable active-learning instance: fixes the measurable binary classifier class, finite ordered pool, pointwise exact target oracle, version spaces, and disagreement region used by this procedure.
Steve Hanneke, Theory of Active Learning, version 1.1, §5.1
Daniel Joseph Hsu, Algorithms for Active Learning, Chapter 2 §§2.1–2.2
Depends on
Used by
- A finite star class can require one query per alternative Example
- Empty pools, singleton classes, and zero query budgets Example
- Exact labels, slow version-space shrinkage, and abstention limits Remark
- Finite-pool version-space invariant and query bound Theorem
- Unanimous version-space prediction and disagreement abstention Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Steve Hanneke, Theory of Active Learning, version 1.1, §5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel Joseph Hsu, Algorithms for Active Learning, Chapter 2 §§2.1–2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)