How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite pool-based realizable active-learning instance
Definition
Let be a nonempty measurable space, let be a probability measure on it, and let be a finite nonempty set of measurable classifiers . A finite pool-based realizable active-learning instance consists of an ordered pool for some , an unknown target , and a deterministic exact label oracle satisfying at every queried point. A fresh feature has target label ; the pool itself need not be sampled from . For a set of queried indices with observed labels , the version space is . For any , its disagreement region is . Since is finite and every classifier is measurable, is measurable. The pointwise exact-oracle assumption is stronger than standard distributional PAC realizability: zero population risk only requires agreement almost surely under the joint law and does not prescribe oracle values at every pool point.
Definition references
Supervised prediction problems: supplies the measurable instance and label spaces, measurable predictors, and joint-law framework specialized here to binary labels.
Realizable and agnostic PAC learning: defines standard PAC realizability by a finite-class member of zero population risk; that almost-sure condition alone does not prescribe pointwise labels on arbitrary pool entries.
Steve Hanneke, Theory of Active Learning, version 1.1, §§2.1–2.2 and §5.1
Daniel Joseph Hsu, Algorithms for Active Learning, Chapter 2
Depends on
Used by
- Finite-pool version-space query procedure Algorithm
- A finite star class can require one query per alternative Example
- Empty pools, singleton classes, and zero query budgets Example
- Median queries identify a finite threshold by binary search Example
- Exact labels, slow version-space shrinkage, and abstention limits Remark
- Finite-pool version-space invariant and query bound Theorem
- Unanimous version-space prediction and disagreement abstention Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Steve Hanneke, Theory of Active Learning, version 1.1, §§2.1–2.2 and §5.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Daniel Joseph Hsu, Algorithms for Active Learning, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)