How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strong- and weak-constraint 4DVAR with a finite gradient run
Definition
Fix , positive dimensions and , open sets , and continuously differentiable maps and . Let , be symmetric positive definite, , and be symmetric positive definite. In weak-constraint mode also require symmetric positive-definite . The strong-constraint decision domain is ; the weak-constraint decision domain is . Both objectives are continuously differentiable on their stated open decision domains. For a positive-definite covariance , write .
In strong-constraint 4DVAR, choose the initial state and generate for . Minimize the trajectory objective
In weak-constraint 4DVAR, the decision variable is the full path . Given model-error covariances , minimize
Select one objective, an initial decision vector in its stated decision domain, a finite iteration limit , and either positive fixed steps or the backtracking parameters required by Gradient descent. Run that algorithm on the selected objective for at most updates and return its last iterate (or report its domain failure). In strong mode return the trajectory generated from the last initial-state iterate; in weak mode return the last path iterate. This is a finite numerical procedure, not a guarantee that a global or local minimizer is reached. The page's BCS-20 hypotheses for gradient descent supply no general guarantee for these objectives.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. J. H. Law, A. M. Stuart, and K. C. Zygalakis, Data Assimilation: A Mathematical Introduction, Chapter 3 §3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Geir Evensen, Femke C. Vossepoel, and Peter Jan van Leeuwen, Data Assimilation Fundamentals, Chapters 4–5 (standard reference, not scraped)