Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Inverse probability weighting for a causal mean

Definition

Let Q be a probability law for an observed discrete or atomic treatment A, a covariate random element L, and a real-valued observed outcome Y. Fix an atom a with Q(A=a)>0, let G=σ(L), and set Ia=1{A=a},ea(L)=EQ[Ia∣G]. Assume ea(L)>0 Q-almost surely and IaY/ea(L)∈L1(Q). The inverse-probability-weighted functional at a is ΨIPW(Q;a)=EQ ⁣[IaYea(L)], provided the displayed weighted variable is integrable. The outcome weight is Ia/ea(L), formed from the true population propensity ea(L), not an estimate.

The instructions are: form the event indicator Ia; take its conditional expectation given σ(L) to obtain ea(L); divide IaY by this positive random variable; and integrate under Q. This defines a population functional only. It makes no assertion about finite-sample behavior, estimated propensities, or truncated weights.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources