Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Regularized nonlinear Levenberg–Marquardt with discrepancy stopping

Definition

Assume Countable Choice. Let X,Y be real Hilbert spaces, let U⊆X be open, and let F:U→Y be continuously Fréchet differentiable, meaning that F is Fréchet differentiable at each point of U and x↦F′(x) is continuous in operator norm. The input consists of an initial point x0∈U, a datum yδ∈Y, a positive noise bound δ>0, a discrepancy factor τ>1, a forcing fraction σ∈(0,1), a range-approximation margin γ>1, and a finite update budget Nmax⁡∈N0:={0,1,2,…}. Assume an exact solution x†∈U exists with F(x†)=y and ∥yδ−y∥Y≤δ. At every state xnδ before the discrepancy stop, the admissible local range condition is ∥F′(xnδ)(x†−xnδ)+F(xnδ)−yδ∥Y≤σγ∥F(xnδ)−yδ∥Y.

For xnδ∈U and α>0, define hn,α to be the unique global minimizer over h∈X of the regularized linearized least-squares objective Jn,α(h):=12∥F′(xnδ)h+F(xnδ)−yδ∥Y2+α2∥h∥X2. Equivalently, it is the unique solution of (F′(xnδ)∗F′(xnδ)+αIX)hn,α=F′(xnδ)∗(yδ−F(xnδ)). Here IX is the identity operator on X. The forcing rule selects any αn>0 for which ∥F′(xnδ)hn,αn+F(xnδ)−yδ∥Y=σ∥F(xnδ)−yδ∥Y, and sets xn+1δ=xnδ+hn,αn. The displayed range condition is a sufficient condition for the forcing rule to have such a parameter; it is not an input to either linearized minimization problem.

For a finite run, inspect n=0,1,…,Nmax⁡ in order. If xnδ∉U, return (xnδ,n,domain-failure). If ∥F(xnδ)−yδ∥Y≤τδ, return (xnδ,n,discrepancy). If n=Nmax⁡, return (xnδ,n,budget-exhausted). Otherwise request the exact regularized minimizer and a positive parameter satisfying the forcing rule. If the exact minimizer cannot be certified, return (xnδ,n,solve-unverified); if the parameter selector cannot return a positive parameter satisfying the displayed equality, return (xnδ,n,forcing-unavailable). After both exact calls succeed, set xn+1δ=xnδ+hn,αn and continue. Each return is a triple of state, index, and status. No convergence claim is attached to the failure statuses or to a budget-exhausted state.

Remarks

The iteration is unanchored: its increment minimizes the linearized residual plus a positive penalty on the increment. It has no αn(x0−xnδ) term, and the anchored IRGNM theorem is not used for it. The theorem on this page uses exact regularized minimizers and exact residual-forcing parameters; it gives no guarantee for arbitrary inexact linear solves.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources