Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

SOLIT parameter choice on a geometric-variance grid

Definition

Assume Countable Choice. Let T:X→Y be an injective compact Hilbert–Schmidt operator of infinite rank between separable real Hilbert spaces, let S=T∗T, and let (sj,vj,uj) be a fixed positive singular system with λj=sj2. Let Z be a real isonormal Gaussian process on Y, meaning that g↦Z(g) is linear into L2, is centered, has covariance E[Z(g)Z(h)]=⟨g,h⟩Y, and has independent standard-normal values on every finite orthonormal tuple. In the weak observation experiment Yx(g)=⟨Tx,g⟩Y+σZ(g) with known noise standard deviation σ>0, use the ordered filter qα, the geometric-variance candidates α0>⋯>αmmax⁡, and variances vm=σ2∑jλjqαm(λj)2 from the preceding definition. For each candidate index m, the regularized estimator x^m is the L2 limit of its finite singular-coordinate sums; its jth coordinate is λjqαm(λj)θj+σsjqαm(λj)ξj, where θj=⟨x,vj⟩X and ξj=Z(uj).

Take as input the observed sequence y=(yj)j≥1, where yj:=Yx(uj). For each candidate m and each N=1,2,…, compute

x^m,Nobs:=∑j=1Nsjqαm(λj)yjvj.

If these partial sums converge in X, define x^m(y) to be their limit; otherwise set x^m(y)=0X. This specifies an X-valued output for every input sequence. The quantities vm1,m2 and zm1,m2(x) are determined by the known operator, filter, noise level and Gaussian coordinate law.

For 0≤m1<m2≤mmax⁡, set

vm1,m2:=σ2∑j≥1λj(qαm2(λj)−qαm1(λj))2

and let Nm1,m2 be the norm of the centered estimator difference divided by σ. For x>0, define its upper quantile by

zm1,m2(x):=inf⁡{z≥0:P(Nm1,m2>z)≤e−x}.

Given fixed β>0 and γ>0, for 0≤m<mmax⁡ put xm:=2(1+γ)log⁡(vm+1/v0), and for each pair m1<m2 put ηm1,m2:=σzm1,m2(xm1)+βvm1,m2. Accept an index m1 exactly when ∥x^m1(y)−x^m2(y)∥X≤ηm1,m2 for every m2 with m1<m2≤mmax⁡, and output the smallest accepted index m^ and parameter α^=αm^. For m1=mmax⁡, accept without comparisons, including when mmax⁡=0. This rule uses only the observed sequence, the known operator and filter, the noise level, the fixed candidate grid, and β,γ; it does not use x or its source index φ.

Rule diagram

The arrows show the order of the finite procedure: form the regularized estimates, compare each candidate with every finer one using the two-index threshold, then return the smallest candidate that passes all of its comparisons. The diagram illustrates the algorithm only; the proofs of its properties use the coordinate definitions and inequalities.

observationsyj=Yx(uj)observed-datapartialsumsbxm;Nall¯ner-indextwo-indextestssmallestacceptedindexbm

Remarks

The constant γ controls the strength of the noise quantiles, while β controls the bias tolerance. The quantile definition remains meaningful when a pairwise Gaussian difference is degenerate; then its upper quantile is zero.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources