How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-memory-free proximal bundle method with serious and null steps
Definition
Let be nonempty, closed, and convex; let be convex; fix , a serious-step fraction , a center , and an integer outer budget . A valid oracle call at returns with ; otherwise it fails. Store every cut from every successful call, with no memory cap, and set to the maximum of the stored cuts. If no cut exists, call the oracle at the current center. If this initialization call fails, return status oracle-failure with the current center, zero completed trials, and no candidate or model residual; otherwise store its cut. Find the unique minimizer If , return status stationary-or-model-failure with . Otherwise evaluate at . An oracle failure returns oracle-failure. Declare a serious step exactly when , set then, and otherwise take a null step and set . Append the valid trial cut after either step. Return budget-exhausted after trials. This finite algorithm makes no generic convergence claim.
Depends on
- Maximum and minimum of a set
- Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum
- Subgradients and the subdifferential of a convex function
- Convex and strictly convex functions on Euclidean convex sets
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
- A convex subset of $\mathbb{R}^m$ contains every line segment between two of its points
- Interior, closure, boundary, limit point, isolated point and dense subset of a metric space
Used by
- A max-affine kink produces one null and one serious bundle step Example
- The proximal bundle method returns within its finite trial budget Lemma
- The proximal bundle model subproblem has a unique minimizer Lemma
- Vanishing aggregate-model error controls the proximal candidate Lemma
- Proximal bundle accumulation under vanishing aggregate-model error Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mateo Díaz and Benjamin Grimmer, Optimal Convergence Rates for the Proximal Bundle Method, §§2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dominikus Noll, Olivier Prot, and Aude Rondepierre, A proximity control algorithm to minimize nonsmooth and nonconvex functions, §§2–4 (standard reference, not scraped)