Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Relative approximate counting with unknown marked count

Definition

Input. A Boolean predicate on N=2n≥1 addresses with an integer n≥0, the fully declared controlled counting access model, and rational 0<ϵ≤1.

Set ℓ=0. Repeatedly increment ℓ, set L=2ℓ, run a fresh Count(f,L), and stop exactly when its label y is nonzero or L2≥4N. The test y≠0 is an exact finite label test. Initialize m=0 and M=1; repeatedly increment m and double M while M<[20(22/7)2/ϵ]L, using exact rational comparison, so that M=2m. Run a fresh Count(f,M) and run Rational-interval rounding of a counting output on (N,M,y) to output an integer within 2/3 of its exact algebraic count estimate, as proved by Terminating certified rounding for a counting estimate. The scale loop returns the least power of two meeting its rational threshold; all scales are powers of two and the multiplier grows as 1/ϵ times L.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources