How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complete-graph continuous-time search
Definition
Inputs: An integer , an integer , an injective label encoding , and the corresponding -qubit register. Its active subspace is ; bit strings outside the image of are unused labels. The marked label is available through the declared oracle/access model, not as an inspected classical value.
On , define the complete-graph adjacency by and extend by zero on . Define on the full register and the self-adjoint generator .
The input also supplies:
- a state-preparation circuit whose label-register output from the specified zero input is the pure state ; if its implementation uses workspace, the model states its initialization, final state, and separate query, gate, and description-bit costs;
- the total Boolean function defined by exactly when and on every unused label, together with the full unitary XOR-oracle access and its cost from Coherent XOR function oracle; and
- a Hamiltonian-access contract that supplies either the ideal or a unitary simulator with a supplied certificate , including all query, gate, description-bit, precision, and classical-construction costs.
The function oracle does not itself supply the continuous-time operation : any conversion from its marked predicate to evolution under , and any simulation of the adjacency term, must be separately declared and charged under Continuous-time Hamiltonian access cost model.
Procedure: Prepare , apply the supplied ideal evolution or simulator
for , and measure the register in its computational basis
using Finite projective measurements. Decode a measured string in the image
of to its label and return it; return FAIL on an unused string. If
and is the standard -bit encoding, the supplied preparation
may be by
Hadamard preparation of a uniform binary state; charge gates when
is primitive and the declared synthesis costs otherwise. For arbitrary ,
is a supplied, charged input. No query, gate, or runtime bound follows from
the finite matrix description alone.
Depends on
- Continuous-time quantum walk
- Graph adjacency and Laplacian generator conventions
- Continuous-time Hamiltonian access cost model
- Hadamard preparation of a uniform binary state
- Coherent XOR function oracle
- Finite projective measurements
- Circuit-family and computation cost model
- Dirac Notation Conversion
- Finite registers and their ordered computational bases
- Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
55 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, Chapter 17 §17.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, Chapter 9 §9.1 (standard reference, not scraped)