How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite rejection sampler for a linear combination
Definition
Inputs: an integer , vectors with ℓ2 sample/query access, real coefficients , and a positive integer cap . Set and . Output: an index or FAIL.
If , return FAIL. Otherwise, for each of at most trials:
- Using fresh randomness, choose with probability , then sample from . A zero-weight term is never chosen, so every requested vector distribution is defined.
- Query all and set By Cauchy--Schwarz, , so this is a valid acceptance probability.
- With a fresh independent acceptance coin, accept index with probability and return upon acceptance.
If all trials reject, return FAIL. When but , every defined acceptance probability is zero and the cap still forces a finite FAIL output. No normalized target distribution is assigned when . All samples, entry queries, random bits, cap, and output writing are charged. Correctness and cost of the linear-combination sampler ↗ proves the target law on the accepted branch and the failure and query bounds under its separate hypotheses on , the cancellation ratio, and .
Depends on
- ℓ2 sample/query access to vectors and matrices
- Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities
- Pairwise and mutual independence of finite-valued random variables
- Cauchy-Schwarz $\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2$ with its equality case, the triangle inequality for $\lVert\cdot\rVert_2$, the parallelogram law and polarisation
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ewin Tang, A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems, version 3 (standard reference, not scraped)